Course Coordinator:Trudi Flynn (tflynn@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This course aims to sensitise you to a wide range of ethical and legal issues in the practice of counselling and psychotherapy and to provide you with resources upon which you can rely to help you deal responsibly with these crucial issues. You will learn about culturally relevant ethical decision making and understand the historical and philosophical underpinnings of current ethical standards. Professional Codes of Ethics will be analysed; practical and concrete examples will be examined and you will reflect on your values and beliefs which may impact on your ethical decision-making process. The reflective practice stream of the course aims to increase your awareness of the value of critical reflection in counselling practice; and how this process may be used by counsellors as a tool for personal and professional growth.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On campus workshop - 3 hours | 3hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Professional Codes of Ethics; Ethical decision-making models
Applied ethical decision making; Introduction to reflective practice
Ethical considerations: The person and the professional;
Stress, burn-out and self-care in counselling
Informed Consent and Confidentiality;
Reflective practice: benefits and barriers;
Ethical practice in a multicultural society; Cultural values and assumptions in multicultural counselling;
Reflexivity in reflective practice;
Ethics of online counselling; Counselling in the community;
Boundaries and Multiple Relationships;
Structured models of reflective practice I;
Structured models of reflective practice II;
Arts-based reflective practice;
Ethical and legal issues in Couples and Family Therapy work;
Reflective practice: Family of Origin work I and II
Ethics of supervision; Reflective Journal Overview
Positive Ethics; Self as Ethical Practitioner
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Analyse critically and reflect on the complex theories, principles and practices of ethics in relation to counselling practice. |
Knowledgeable Ethical |
| 2 | Critically analyse counselling case scenarios and apply sound ethical decision making to those cases and articulate and defend your ethical decision. |
Knowledgeable Empowered Ethical |
| 3 | Understand and discuss ethical dilemmas that may arise in counselling and synthesise appropriate responses for diverse contexts and multicultural cases. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Ethical |
| 4 | Identify personal values and beliefs and biases that may have an impact on your ethical decision in counselling practice. |
Ethical Engaged |
| 5 | Evidenced understanding of reflective practice as it pertains to counselling; |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered Engaged |
| 6 | Analyse outcomes from reflective practice and deduce implications for practice based on personal learning, and develop an intended course of action; |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Engaged |
| 7 | Demonstrate a developing scholarly capacity in written submissions, incorporating clarity of written expression, integration of academic literature, and adherence to APA style. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Engaged |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in Program AR708
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
In Week 4, students will be invited to complete a formative four item short answer quiz, that will inquire into content covered within the first four weeks of the course. Informal formative feedback will also be offered in relation to activities completed within workshops during this period.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Quiz/zes | Individual | 20% | 60 Minutes |
Week 4 | Online Test (Quiz) |
| All | 2 | Case Study | Individual | 40% | 2000 Words |
Week 9 | Online Submission |
| All | 3 | Report | Individual | 40% | 2500 Words |
Week 13 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Ethics and Reflective Practice Quiz | |||||||
| Goal: | You will demonstrate knowledge of key concepts of ethical and reflective practice as taught to Week 4. |
||||||
| Product: | Quiz/zes | ||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||
| Format: | An online short answer test that examines ethics and reflective practice knowledge explored during the first five weeks of the course. |
||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Information literacy |
||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Case Studies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | Critically analyse two case scenarios and apply sound ethical decision making to those cases and articulate and defend your ethical decision. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Case Study | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Two case scenarios will be posted on Canvas. You are to analyse each case and discuss the ethical dilemma posed and then use your Ethic Decision Making Model to argue how you will approach the case. Literature relevant to your decisions must be cited. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Reflective Practice Report | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To develop understanding and capacity in relation to professional reflective practice. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Report | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Throughout the course of the semester, you will be invited to engage in a series of reflective practice activities. The Task 3 assignment consists of a reflective report that will draw from your experiences to consider the value of reflective practice for counsellors. The report will incorporate: an introduction to professional reflective practice, reflections on three reflective journal exercises completed during the course, and a discussion section describing i) what was learnt via the reflective process, ii) perceived value of the process, iii) implications for future practice, and iv) a comment on the utility of reflective practice in counselling. The approximate word limit for the assignment is around 2500 words. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Gerald Corey,Marianne Schneider Corey,Cindy Corey | 2019 | Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions | 10 | Cengage Learning |
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.