Course Coordinator:Cathryn Morriss (cmorriss@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This is an advanced course that provides you with an in-depth and extensive analysis of the theoretical and applied principles of peace and conflict transformation, human rights as a global ethical framework, as well as contemporary environmental issues that come together in specifically contemporary ways. The course will help you gain an in depth understanding of the complex issues within violence, conflict and peace.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Weekly online learning materials | 1hr | Week 1 | 13 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Weekly tutorials | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Critically reflect on concepts of peace and conflict, and environmental justice, to evaluate models and theories associated with these areas of study. | Creative and critical thinker |
| 2 | Critically evaluate complex real life issues using peace and conflict theories, and environmental justice, to demonstrate the potentialities for sustainability and sustainable peace. | Creative and critical thinker |
| 3 | Evaluate, compare and communicate research on peace and conflict, and environmental justice, using ethical and socially responsible strategies. | Engaged |
| 4 | Develop advanced collaborative qualities to mimic that of a worker in an NGO in the fields of peace and conflict, human rights, and environmental justice. |
Knowledgeable Engaged |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in any PGRD Program
Not applicable
SCS216
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Timely and detailed feedback is provided for each assessment. Feedback is provided both within text and general comments to build scholarly skills. Students are able to seek feedback through face-to-face discussion with the course coordinator. Tutorials will include extended discussion and review of the assessment task requirements
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 15% | 1000 words |
Refer to Format | Online Submission |
| All | 2 | Oral | Individual and Group | 45% | 30 Minutes |
Refer to Format | In Class |
| All | 3 | Essay | Individual | 40% | 3000 words |
Week 13 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Critical Reflection | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | Critically reflect on learning material topics in preparation for task 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Submit: Week 3-4. This task is a chance to reflect more deeply on the key concepts that will inform your Task 2 presentation. The reflections should demonstrate engagement with the course materials and the application of key concepts to one or more settings that enable you to identify, analyse and evaluate how these concepts aid in broadening your understanding of at least two areas of interest within the scope of the course. The format, negotiated with the Course Coordinator in the first tutorial, may be a written essay, or a combination of both a visual representation (artistic/video/creative work) and accompanying written contextualisation of the work. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Presentation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This assessment will give you the opportunity to apply knowledge and skills gained through engaging with the learning materials and tutorials to an issue that has broader relevance to your degree or to your areas of personal interest. It will enhance your understanding of the relevance of human rights, peace and conflict studies, and environmental justice to a specific contemporary issue or event and how sociological approaches might enable a deeper understanding of the issue at hand. The oral presentation will allow you to demonstrate your understanding of why a creative approach to communicating for peace, especially as this relates to environmental issues, is helpful in engaging society in the processes for peacebuilding by using ethical and socially responsible strategies to engage an audience. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Oral | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Submit: Week 6-12. In groups of 2 or 3 you will produce a creative and informative presentation for a simulated conference setting based on a case study of your choosing that reflects one of the topics covered in the course. Your group's presentation will be 30 minutes in total. All group members must be involved as active participants. The presentation must demonstrate competency in applying appropriate creative elements of engagement with the audience. All students will then offer a brief individual critique of at least two presentations other than their own. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Analytical Essay | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This task is designed to demonstrate your ability to integrate personal reflections with theoretical analysis. You will critically apply your knowledge of key concepts and advanced theories of human rights, peace and conflict, environmental justice, conflict resolutions frameworks, social, political, cultural and ethical considerations to a specific self-identified circumstance and develop the capacity to succinctly reflect upon how those factors impact on identifiable or perceived outcomes. This task requires you to critically evaluate diverse real-life issues using peace and conflict, and environmental justice theories to demonstrate the potentiality of sustainable and sustainability in peace engagement, and to communicate your understandings, perceptions and analysis of the content in a well-developed scholarly fashion. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Essay | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | This task involves preparation of an analytical essay of 3000 words. The topic of the essay is self-identified and may either build upon the task 2 topic or introduce a new topic for analysis. This essay will incorporate theoretical understandings and frameworks to analyse a contemporary conflict situation. The essay structure is negotiable and must be approved by the Course Coordinator during an individual planning meeting to be scheduled no later than week 10. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.