Course Coordinator:Jacqueline Blake (jblake@usc.edu.au) School:School of Science, Technology and Engineering
UniSC Sunshine CoastUniSC Moreton BayUniSC Adelaide |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Online |
Online | You can do this course without coming onto campus, unless your program has specified a mandatory onsite requirement. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
In professional practice, most engineers will spend significant amounts of time managing projects. ENG302 aims to provide you with appropriate knowledge, skills and techniques that would be used to maximise project outcomes and success. This will be useful for your final-year project proposal, and will include areas such as project life cycle, project management processes, project scope, time management, quality, and procurement.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Asynchronous Learning Material | 1hr | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On campus workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Online | |||
| Learning materials – Asynchronous Learning Material | 1hr | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Online workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
300 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | understand and explain the nature of engineering projects |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
| 2 | illustrate and understand how engineering project activities may be influenced by economic, environment, societal and organisational factors |
Knowledgeable Sustainability-focussed |
| 3 | access and evaluate information relevant to an engineering project |
Knowledgeable Empowered |
| 4 | understand complex issues associated with engineering projects |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
| 5 | understand ethical dimensions associated with conducting an engineering project |
Creative and critical thinker Ethical |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Students must have completed 96 units.
Not applicable
ENG305
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Formative feedback provided in weekly workshop exercises and in class discussions.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | Individual | 20% | 1500 words |
Week 5 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 2 | Report | Individual | 40% | 1500 words |
Week 9 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Report | Individual | 40% | 2000 Word |
Week 12 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check and in class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Project Management Charter | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts relating to the management of a project. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Individual submission creating a project charter based on a case study. |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Project Plan | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts relating to the management of a project by creating sections of a project plan, in response to a case study. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Report | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Individual submission |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Project Plan | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts relating to the management of a project by creating sections of a project plan, in response to a case study. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Report | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Individual submission |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.
For course-specific questions, contact your teaching staff or Course Coordinator.
For other enquiries or to access support, please contact Student Central: