Course Coordinator:Helen Fairweather (hfairwea@usc.edu.au) School:School of Science, Technology and Engineering
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
Problem solving skills are essential requirements for engineers. When complex theoretical and technical problems are solved, new knowledge is created. In this course you learn how to apply the engineering research process and methods of inquiry to solve these problems. This involves critiquing current research in your discipline and developing competence in using instruments and software to collect data. You analyse and evaluate the results and judge their quality and limitations. You also learn how to communicate findings in specific engineering formats to specialist audiences.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Lecture | 2hrs | Not applicable | 13 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 | 2hrs | Not applicable | 12 times |
Literature search,
review and citation practices
Problem identification, formulating research questions
Quantitative and qualitative methods – strengths and weaknesses
Instrumentation and data logging
Data sampling, collection, testing
Data analysis, interpretation and limitations
Validity, reliability, sources of error
Data management and presentation
400 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Engineers Australia Stage 1 Professional Engineer Competency Standards | |
| 1 | Apply current knowledge of quantitative and qualitative methods used in engineering research. | Empowered |
1.4
|
| 2 | Analyse, interpret and evaluate data that relate to complex theoretical and technical engineering problems. | Creative and critical thinker |
2.1, 2.2 |
| 3 | Communicate complex research results to specialist audiences. | Engaged |
3.3, 3.4 |
| 4 | Act professionally, autonomously and in teams to produce a professional product. | Ethical |
3.4, 3.5, 3.6 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| Engineers Australia Stage 1 Professional Engineer Competency Standards | |
| 1.4 | Knowledge and Skill Base: Discernment of knowledge development and research directions within the engineering discipline. |
| 2.1 | Engineering Application Ability: Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving. |
| 2.2 | Engineering Application Ability: Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources. |
| 3.3 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. |
| 3.4 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Professional use and management of information. |
| 3.5 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Orderly management of self, and professional conduct. |
| 3.6 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Effective team membership and team leadership. |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
192 units and enrolled in Program SC410, SC411, SC425
Not applicable
Not applicable
Statistics, computer programming (e.g. MATLAB and EXCEL scripting) to analyse data
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Online quizzes from week 2 will provide both the student and the lecturer/tutors with a mechanism for tracking the student’s progress.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | Group | 40% | Pitch video + 1500 word technical report |
Week 7 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 2 | Literature Review (or component) | Individual | 30% | 1500 words |
Week 12 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Quiz/zes | Individual | 30% | Online quizzes related to the material presented each week |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | Online Submission |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Data Analyses of an Engineering-based Problem | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This is an authentic assessment item that immerses you in the complexity you can expect as a practicing engineer applying your knowledge of the engineering research process and methods. You will demonstrate skill in data techniques to determine the limitations inherent in measurement and analyses. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will be participating in the GovHack Queensland weekend event and provided with real data that is in the public domain. You will work collaboratively to create a video pitch of idea/concept and solution and write a technical report on analyses conducted. You will be awarded an individual grade according to an algorithm that uses the grade assigned by the lecturer/tutor for the whole task plus a rating of your contribution by the other students in the group (a peer assessment)-. Peer ratings are submitted when you submit the report. Marks will be recorded and made available to students through Gradebook. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Literature review and identifying a research question | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | You will take the role of a researcher and write an individual 1500 word literature review and critically analyse a publication in a relevant Civil or Mechanical Engineering field. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Literature Review (or component) | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | 1500 words Harvard referencing More information in your Blackboard assignment folder. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Three Quizzes | |||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate and apply knowledge, analyse relationships, and solve problems in Engineering research methods. |
||||||
| Product: | Quiz/zes | ||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||
| Format: | Weeks 4, 8 and 12 You will be asked to solve Engineering problems in an online quiz for three weeks of the semester on Blackboard based on material covered in the lectures and tutorials. |
||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||
| Generic Skills: | |||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Thiel, D. V. | 2014 | Research Methods for Engineering (ebook available through the library) | n/a | Cambridge University Press, UK |
Safety glasses and closed in footwear
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.