Course Coordinator:Adrian McCallum (amccallu@usc.edu.au) School:School of Science, Technology and Engineering
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to usc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
Without solid foundations, all built structures are in danger of collapse. This practical course uses a systems design cycle approach to initially inspect and test soil properties. Based on these results, you learn how to design, construct, test and assess the performance of structures within and upon the soil. It is a problem-based learning course where you work individually and in groups to self-direct your learning. Over a semester you conduct a field-based geotechnical project for a ‘client’ to whom you report progress. The project is complemented by laboratory testing and theory.
Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
Blended learning | |||
Learning materials – Asynchronous learning material | 1hr | Week 1 | 13 times |
Laboratory 1 – On campus lab | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Significance of geotechnical engineering
Determining soil strength
Lateral earth pressures
Retaining walls
Shallow & deep foundations
Slope failure
Ground improvement
Earthquakes & liquefaction
Critical State Soil Mechanics
Other methods
400 Level (Graduate)
12 units
Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Engineers Australia Stage 1 Professional Engineer Competency Standards | |
1 | Apply current practical and theoretical knowledge of fundamental geotechnical engineering principles, concepts and technologies that relate to building structures on soil in regional contexts | Knowledgeable |
1.1, 1.3, 2.1 |
2 | Solve complex theoretical and technical engineering problems by taking a whole systems design cycle approach to: *select and use established engineering methods, techniques, tools and resources, *determine inherent parameters of materials, components and systems by safely carrying out testing and experiments, collecting data, and dealing with sources of error, *interpret, critically analyse, evaluate and synthesise current and emerging information to inform decision-making, *develop and/or model and justify solutions, taking into account potential outcomes, constraints, risks and research-based evidence |
Creative and critical thinker Engaged |
2.1, 2.2, 2.3 |
3 | Plan, design, construct, test and assess an engineering structure on soil under supervision. | Creative and critical thinker |
2.4, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 |
4 | Communicate to a Project Manager in different modes (written, oral and visual) and specified industry formats (e.g. reports, diagrams, client presentations) | Empowered |
3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 |
5 | Act professionally by: functioning autonomously and in teams, adhering to the engineering code of ethics, demonstrating fundamental management skills | Ethical |
3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 |
CODE | COMPETENCY |
Engineers Australia Stage 1 Professional Engineer Competency Standards | |
1.1 | Knowledge and Skill Base: Comprehensive, theory based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the engineering discipline. |
1.3 | Knowledge and Skill Base: In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the engineering discipline. |
2.1 | Engineering Application Ability: Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving. |
2.2 | Engineering Application Ability: Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources. |
2.3 | Engineering Application Ability: Application of systematic engineering synthesis and design processes. |
2.4 | Engineering Application Ability: Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of engineering projects. |
3.1 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Ethical conduct and professional accountability. |
3.2 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains. |
3.3 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. |
3.4 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Professional use and management of information. |
3.5 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Orderly management of self, and professional conduct. |
3.6 | Professional and Personal Attributes: Effective team membership and team leadership. |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
ENG312 or CIV201 and enrolled in Program SC410, SC425
Not applicable
CIV3403 (USQ equivalent Course)
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Formative feedback is delivered on a weekly basis after weekly in-class presentations. Both verbal and written feedback is also provided upon the receipt of each weekly submission.
Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
All | 1 | Quiz/zes | Individual | 40% | 4 short answer / calculation questions (500 words or equivalent) issued from weeks 2 through 11; best 4 from 10 will be counted |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | Online Submission |
All | 2 | Plan | Individual | 20% | 15 minutes with visual media |
Week 7 | In Class |
All | 3 | Report | Group | 40% | 5000 words or equivalent (e.g. diagrams) +/- 10% |
Refer to Format | Online Submission |
All - Assessment Task 1:Weekly individual tutorial questions contained within a report format. | |
Goal: | Preparation of technical reports is an essential skill for competent Engineers. This assessment is designed for you to develop and receive summative feedback on your current practical and theoretical geotechnical knowledge to solve complex technical engineering problems related to the project. This task directly assists you to be successful in Task 3. |
Product: | Quiz/zes |
Format: | Submit: Before the symposium of the following week Individually you will prepare a short weekly Technical Report that presents solutions and analyses of questions posed to address the key themes of each week. Implications of the results for the project should be discussed. The PM examines these reports and provides feedback. You are to act on any feedback and incorporate necessary changes into future submissions. |
Criteria: |
|
All - Assessment Task 2:Verbal 'Client' briefing - Project Plan | |
Goal: | Individually apply current practical and theoretical geotechnical knowledge to follow the necessary steps to plan and design an achievable project for a 'client'. |
Product: | Plan |
Format: | This task is an individual 15 minute presentation in the form of a briefing to the ‘client’ for whom you are carrying out the project, in front of an audience of your engineering peers. It includes a question and answer session. You choose visual media to suit the way you wish to communicate, e.g. film, poster, power point, etc. This will be uploaded to Canvas on completion of the presentation. Assume the ‘client’ has limited engineering knowledge, so you will need to restrict the use of terms to the essential ones and define them, as well as interpret data and diagrams for the ‘client’. You will present the project plan that you developed in groups of 3-5 (depending on the class size). Outline how you propose to achieve all assessment and practical goals by the end of week 13. Your Project Plan includes the standard industry requirements: scope definition, aim and proposed outputs, work and reporting schedules, resources, budget, milestones, risk assessment, organisational structure. Additionally, you will briefly focus on one particular aspect of the envisaged investigation. |
Criteria: |
|
All - Assessment Task 3:Project completion report | |
Goal: | To report on the completion of the project in relation to the plan for the design, construction, testing and assessment of an engineering structure on soil under supervision. |
Product: | Report |
Format: | Submit: Friday Week 16 The individual report of 2000 words or equivalent +/- 10% (including diagrams) is to the PM. It is weighted 40% and encapsulates the aims, progression and outcomes of the project in relation to the project plan. It comprises: *A synopsis of the project that follows typical industry requirements: project aims investigations and testing carried-out on the soil and built structure results of any investigations discussion & implications of results conclusions in relation to aims, and recommendations. *Appendix 1: the Project plan showing, via track changes, that you have amended it following feedback from, and grading, by the PM *Appendix 2: the five field/laboratory reports each incorporating any amendments following feedback from, and review by, the PM |
Criteria: |
|
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Please note that you need to have regular access to the resource(s) listed below. Resources may be required or recommended.
Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
Recommended | Nagaratnam Sivakugan,Braja M. Das | 2009 | Geotechnical Engineering | n/a | J. Ross Publishing |
Enclosed footwear is required whenever working within the engineering laboratory. Enclosed footwear, high-visibility vest, hat and sunscreen are required for any field work on or off campus. Background to the assessment tasks This course involves your management of a semester-long practical field-based geotechnical engineering construction project. This will simulate the challenges of being a Project Engineer (PE) working with others to meet the expectations of your Project Manager (PM) (lecturer) and ultimately the client. You are given the client’s broad specifications for the project, requiring you to design, construct, test and assess a structure built on soil. Your group of PEs will manage the scope of the project and your first task is to produce a Project Plan outlining how you will successfully manage the project to completion. On a weekly basis you will report to the PM with: a progress update (tasks achieved in the week), future-works (tasks for the following week), results of any field/laboratory testing, and any impediments to progress with suggested solutions. As the project nears completion, you brief the ‘client’ on a selected technical aspect of the project and prepare your Final Project Report. The PM will give you regular feedback on your progress and assess your work on behalf of the ‘client’ (additional task information is below). This course fosters your independence and ability to work in a team and nurtures your project management, communication and problem-solving skills. Through successful completion of these tasks and effective management of your project, you should pass the course thus preparing you for your 4th year Honours engineering project.
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying: The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4% The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale You have not failed an assessment task in the course due to academic misconduct
Late submission of assessment tasks may be penalised at the following maximum rate: - 5% (of the assessment task's identified value) per day for the first two days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. - 10% (of the assessment task's identified value) for the third day - 20% (of the assessment task's identified value) for the fourth day and subsequent days up to and including seven days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. - A result of zero is awarded for an assessment task submitted after seven days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. Weekdays and weekends are included in the calculation of days late. To request an extension you must contact your course coordinator to negotiate an outcome.
UniSC is committed to a culture of respect and providing a safe and supportive environment for all members of our community. For immediate assistance on campus contact SafeUniSC by phone: 07 5430 1168 or using the SafeZone app. For general enquires contact the SafeUniSC team by phone 07 5456 3864 or email safe@usc.edu.au.
The SafeUniSC Specialist Service is a Student Wellbeing service that provides free and confidential support to students who may have experienced or observed behaviour that could cause fear, offence or trauma. To contact the service call 07 5430 1226 or email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au.
For help with course-specific advice, for example what information to include in your assessment, you should first contact your tutor, then your course coordinator, if needed.
If you require additional assistance, the Learning Advisers are trained professionals who are ready to help you develop a wide range of academic skills. Visit the Learning Advisers web page for more information, or contact Student Central for further assistance: +61 7 5430 2890 or studentcentral@usc.edu.au.
Student Wellbeing provide free and confidential counselling on a wide range of personal, academic, social and psychological matters, to foster positive mental health and wellbeing for your academic success.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 1226.
Ability Advisers ensure equal access to all aspects of university life. If your studies are affected by a disability, learning disorder mental health issue, injury or illness, or you are a primary carer for someone with a disability or who is considered frail and aged, AccessAbility Services can provide access to appropriate reasonable adjustments and practical advice about the support and facilities available to you throughout the University.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email AccessAbility@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 2890.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.