Course Coordinator:Nicholas Stevens (nstevens@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to usc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
You are placed in planning organisations in which staff commit to a mentoring program supporting you while you work for a period of 4 - 5 weeks (160 hours). Before your placement, you will consider what issues you need to think about while on placement. These issues will then be reconsidered in post placement sessions in which students share their experiences with each other. The course will build your skills as a reflective practitioner in the planning discipline and familiarise you with workplace practices you need to think about while on placement.
Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
Blended learning | |||
Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On Campus Workshop - 12 hours over 2 days | 12hrs | Orientation week | Once Only |
Placement – Work Placement | 160hrs | Not applicable | Once Only |
Tutorial/Workshop 2 – On Campus Workshop - 6 hours over 1 day | 6hrs | Week 6 | Once Only |
400 Level (Graduate)
24 units
Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Planning Institute of Australia | |
1 | Apply theoretical and technical planning skills to unfamiliar circumstances | Engaged |
2.1.1, 2.1.11, 2.1.7, 2.2.6, 2.1, 2.2 |
2 | Work in a diverse employment situation requiring application of planning theory, knowledge and skills and reflect on personal values, professional practice and legal and theoretical perspectives | Engaged |
1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.12, 2.1.4, 2.1.7, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.5, 2.2.7, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 |
3 | Critique plans, planning tools and built environment proposals | Engaged |
2.2.9, 2.2, 3.5.4, 3.5.5, 3.6.2 |
4 | Demonstrate behaviour and knowledge of personal and professional ethical standards | Ethical |
2.1.6, 2.1.7, 2.3.6, 2.1, 3.1.4, 3.2.6 |
CODE | COMPETENCY |
Planning Institute of Australia | |
1.8 | Effectively use voice, body-language, structure, word choice, graphics, and presentation technologies, across a range of media, appropriate to the knowledge base and cultural background of the audience |
1.9 | Work as a team member, with commitment to shared goals, team processes and appropriate interpersonal skills, including respect, reliability, mutual supportiveness and time management |
1.10 | Operate in a manner that recognises the position of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first peoples of Australia, the relationship of those peoples to planning practice in historical and contemporary terms; and compliance to the maximum extent possible with accepted international standards of best practice working with Indigenous communities |
1.12 | Work in diverse employment situations requiring the application of the theory, knowledge and practice of planning |
2.1.1 | Knowledge of unique and special position of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and Indigenous peoples, their rights and interests, knowledge, culture and traditions, and the appropriate protocols of respect and recognition for engaging with them on matters affecting their rights and interests |
2.1.11 | Capacity to communicate in written, oral, and graphical form about planning issues, development proposals and actions via a range of media to various audiences in a manner appropriate to the situation |
2.1.7 | Capacity to work productively as an individual or in a team, with other planners, or with multidisciplinary and diverse groups, including lay people, while representing and maintaining professional opinions and standards |
2.2.6 | Knowledge of the main processes and forms of governance relevant to planning and of the influence of politics upon these, and the related capacity to design and implement workable and democratic participatory processes in association with communities and other stakeholders |
2.1.4 | Knowledge of and capacity to use relevant technical tools for data collection, analysis and mapping, and have knowledge of quantitative methods, spatial mapping, relevant digital software, and geographic information systems (GIS) |
2.2.2 | Knowledge of planning theories and capacity to critically apply these theories when undertaking planning, including theories that recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ and Indigenous peoples’ rights, interests, laws, perspectives and knowledge systems |
2.2.3 | Knowledge and theories of urban and regional planning and environmental planning and design, including but not restricted to principles of land use, urban form, infrastructure systems, ecological systems, global trends and emerging issues, climate change, transport, the integration of land use and transport, heritage conservation, landscape and human settlement patterns |
2.2.5 | Knowledge of key legal principles and practices in plan making and implementation, including an understanding of native title as a specific land tenure in Australian land and environmental law |
2.2.7 | Capacity to perform key planning tasks via strategic and statutory frameworks |
2.2.9 | Capacity to prepare plans and urban designs to address and manage land use and development issues and opportunities |
2.1.6 | Capacity to make appropriate choices in ethically ambiguous situations based on knowledge of social, economic, environmental, and cultural aspects of planning |
2.3.6 | Capacity to act in typical planning roles using planning law, such as giving basic advice about fundamental principles to lay people and other professionals. |
2.1 | Professional and Ethical Planning Practice |
2.2 | Plan Making, Land use Allocation and Management, and Urban Design |
2.3 | Governance, Law, Plan implementation and Administration |
3.5.4 | Capacity to understand and critique key concepts in transport economics and project planning. |
3.5.5 | Capacity to critique plans and design proposals, according to sustainable transport planning principles, linking these with other forms of planning and urban change influences |
3.6.2 | Capacity to read and understand drawings and plans, including visualisation of the items represented, and to recognise and be able to critique inadequate drawings and representations. |
3.1.4 | Knowledge and understanding of the protocols for engaging with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples including an understanding of the concept of free, prior and informed consent as set out by the Australian Human Rights Commission and best practice ethical guidelines. |
3.2.6 | Capacity to link economic understandings with other ethical and practical dimensions of planning, such as socio-spatial disparities associated with globalisation. |
3.1 | Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ and Indigenous peoples’ rights, interests and planning approaches |
3.2 | Economic Planning |
3.4 | Social Planning |
3.5 | Transport Planning |
3.6 | Urban Design |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
ENP355, ENP336, ENP365, ENP411 and enrolled in Program AR406
Not applicable
Not applicable
You must demonstrate that you have completed a substantial part of the BRUP program so you may reflect on your experiences linking both theory and practice to critique your own knowledge and level of achievement.
Standard Grading (GRD)
High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Timely and detailed feedback is provided for each assessment. Feedback is provided both within text and general comments to build scholarly skills. Students are able to seek feedback through face-to-face discussion with the course coordinator. Tutorials will include extended discussion and review of the assessment task requirements and scope
Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
All | 1 | Plan | Individual | 30% | 1000 - 1500 words |
Week 3 | Online Submission |
All | 2 | Journal | Individual | 50% | 2500 - 3000 words |
Week 8 | Online Submission |
All | 3 | Oral and Written Piece | Individual | 20% | 750 - 1000 words |
Week 8 | In Class |
All | 4 | Code of Conduct | Individual | 0% | n/a |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | To Supervisor |
All - Assessment Task 1:Set of Criteria for assessing learning experience | |
Goal: | To discuss why reflective practice is important; and To develop a set of criteria based on knowledge gained in planning theory and professional practice which can then be used to reflect on your practicum experience. |
Product: | Plan |
Format: | Working as a reflective practitioner - Derivation of a set of criteria for discussing various aspects of professional practice in your learning journal, based on the criteria listed in the learning journal assessment guide. |
Criteria: |
|
All - Assessment Task 2:Learning Journal | |
Goal: | To apply planning theory, knowledge and skills to reflect on your experience gained in the practicum from an ethical, legal and theoretical perspective. |
Product: | Journal |
Format: | You will complete a diary of daily activities and a reflexive report analysing the implications of your experience in terms applying knowledge gained at University.You will maintain a diary while working in the planning organisation.Reflections about practice may include commentary on links between practice and theory, the influence of the institutional context on the nature of planning and insights about your experience and observations. Assessment will also be influenced by the verbal mentor reports which will be used to structure particular discussions in the post placement workshop. |
Criteria: |
|
All - Assessment Task 3:Post placement presentation and discussion | |
Goal: | To discuss and compare experiences in the practicum to present highlights and issues |
Product: | Oral and Written Piece |
Format: | Talk for 10-15 minutes about the highlights of your experience and any issues that arose.You will make a Post Placement verbal presentation and participate in discussions about the student experiences.Your group will then discuss any issues raised in the workshop. Topics may be drawn from mentor reports, lecturer's observations of students working, and student summary and prioritisation of issues. |
Criteria: |
|
All - Assessment Task 4:Code of Conduct | |
Goal: | This task enables you to become familiar with the code of conduct for your discipline and work within its guidelines during a work integrated learning (WIL) experience |
Product: | Code of Conduct |
Format: | During your WIL experience you are required to complete the required hours of work experience.To be eligible to pass, you are required to complete the internship satisfactorily according to the criteria below. See Canvas for your discipline specific Code of Conduct. |
Criteria: |
|
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying: The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4% The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale You have not failed an assessment task in the course due to academic misconduct.
Late submission of assessment tasks may be penalised at the following maximum rate: - 5% (of the assessment task's identified value) per day for the first two days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. - 10% (of the assessment task's identified value) for the third day - 20% (of the assessment task's identified value) for the fourth day and subsequent days up to and including seven days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. - A result of zero is awarded for an assessment task submitted after seven days from the date identified as the due date for the assessment task. Weekdays and weekends are included in the calculation of days late. To request an extension you must contact your course coordinator to negotiate an outcome.
UniSC is committed to a culture of respect and providing a safe and supportive environment for all members of our community. For immediate assistance on campus contact SafeUniSC by phone: 07 5430 1168 or using the SafeZone app. For general enquires contact the SafeUniSC team by phone 07 5456 3864 or email safe@usc.edu.au.
The SafeUniSC Specialist Service is a Student Wellbeing service that provides free and confidential support to students who may have experienced or observed behaviour that could cause fear, offence or trauma. To contact the service call 07 5430 1226 or email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au.
For help with course-specific advice, for example what information to include in your assessment, you should first contact your tutor, then your course coordinator, if needed.
If you require additional assistance, the Learning Advisers are trained professionals who are ready to help you develop a wide range of academic skills. Visit the Learning Advisers web page for more information, or contact Student Central for further assistance: +61 7 5430 2890 or studentcentral@usc.edu.au.
Student Wellbeing provide free and confidential counselling on a wide range of personal, academic, social and psychological matters, to foster positive mental health and wellbeing for your academic success.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 1226.
Ability Advisers ensure equal access to all aspects of university life. If your studies are affected by a disability, learning disorder mental health issue, injury or illness, or you are a primary carer for someone with a disability or who is considered frail and aged, AccessAbility Services can provide access to appropriate reasonable adjustments and practical advice about the support and facilities available to you throughout the University.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email AccessAbility@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 2890.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.