Course Coordinator:Cherie Wells (cwells@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Physiotherapy
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
In this course you will develop a research proposal and apply for ethics approval to conduct your research. You will extend your understanding of different research methods and examine key ethical requirements related to research in Australia. You will also present and justify their research proposal and obtain support and feedback from their peers and other researchers.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Online resources to assist students in preparing for tutorial sessions and conducting research | 2hrs | Week 1 | 11 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Research skills and support | 2hrs | Week 1 | 11 times |
| Seminar – Introduction to course & assessment support (Wk 1 & 11) | 1hr | Week 1 | 2 times |
400 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Physiotherapy Board of Australia | |
| 1 | Design and justify robust research methods of high quality which align with research aims and research questions |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 6.1 |
| 2 | Apply understanding of research ethics and integrity when designing research methods and completing ethics applications |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered Ethical |
2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 6.1 |
| 3 | Demonstrate effective communication, critical thinking and reflection, and a commitment to learning and improvement |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered Engaged |
3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 6.1 |
| 4 | Develop and write a research proposal that is clear, well-structured, detailed, and supported by research evidence |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 6.1 |
| 5 | Demonstrate respectful and professional behaviour, and effective self management, organisation and collaboration with others |
Empowered Ethical Engaged Sustainability-focussed |
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 6.1, 7.1 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| Physiotherapy Board of Australia | |
| 2.1 | Comply with legal, professional, ethical and other relevant standards, codes and guidelines |
| 2.2 | Make and act on informed and appropriate decisions about acceptable professional and ethical behaviours |
| 2.3 | Recognise the need for, and implement, appropriate strategies to manage their physical and mental health and resilience |
| 3.1 | Use clear, accurate, sensitive and effective communication to support the development of trust and rapport in professional relationships with the client and relevant others |
| 3.2 | Record and effectively communicate physiotherapy assessment findings, outcomes and decisions |
| 4.1 | Assess their practice against relevant professional benchmarks and take action to continually improve their practice |
| 4.2 | Evaluate their learning needs, engage in relevant continuing professional development and recognise when to seek professional support, including peer review |
| 4.3 | Efficiently consume and effectively apply research and commit to practice informed by best available research evidence and new knowledge |
| 4.4 | Proactively apply principles of quality improvement and risk management to practice |
| 4.5 | Recognise situations that are outside their scope of expertise or competence and take appropriate and timely action |
| 6.1 | Use education to empower themselves and others |
| 7.1 | Organise and prioritise their workload and resources to provide safe, effective and efficient physiotherapy autonomously and, where relevant, as a team member |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
HLT400 and enrolled in BH001 and Research pathway
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Limited Grading (PNP)
Students will receive regular formative feedback during workshops, and from their supervisor throughout the trimester.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | Variable length (but aim for no more than 3000 words or 7 pages with diagrams/figures, excluding attachments) |
Refer to Format | Online Submission |
| All | 2 | Written Piece | Individual | Variable - dependent on the length of research methods required by supervisor(s) and for selected journal for publication. No more than 2000 words is suggested. |
Exam Period | Online Submission |
| All | 3 | Report | Individual | One page progress report using template provided, in addition to a one page GANTT chart created by the student. |
Exam Period | Online Submission |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Draft Research Ethics Application | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To encourage student engagement with learning and to ensure students keep on track to meet research deadlines to complete their embedded honours degree. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | The draft ethics application will consist of a completed: 1. Human Research Ethics Application (download copy from NHMRC website) 2. Attachment 1 - Research Description/Clinical Trial Protocol 3. Attachment 2 - Participant Information Sheet & Consent Form 4. Attachment 3 - Other required materials for recruitment (e.g. adverts) or data collection tools (e.g. survey) The ethics application and attachments are due for submission by the end of Week 2 of the Examination period. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Draft Research Proposal | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To provide students with early feedback from their supervisor(s) on their draft research proposal/methods to facilitate improvements prior to submission of thesis for examination in HLT403 Research Dissertation D. A due date for submission in this course also facilitates student organisation and time management in completing their research and meeting project deadlines. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | The research proposal should be submitted in word format for supervisor review to CANVAS. Turnitin software will not be used as this assignment will not be formally marked (draft status only). Despite this, students will need to adhere to academic integrity guidelines and reference all citations using the referencing style required by selected journal for publication. A reference list is also expected to accompany the research proposal. Students need to submit their draft proposal to CANVAS by end of the second week of the examination period. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Progress Report | ||||||||||
| Goal: | To assist students in developing research plans, meeting project milestones, reflecting on progress, and identifying learning and support needs. |
|||||||||
| Product: | Report | |||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||
| Format: | At the end of the examination period students will need to submit a progress report in relation to their honours research project. This report will need to be co-signed by the research supervisor(s) and uploaded to CANVAS for review by the subject coordinator. Students need to submit this report by the end of the second week of the examination period. The progress report template will be provided on CANVAS and will ask students to provide an update of their project plans, comment on progress to date - including research methods and ethics application, and next steps. Students will also be required to reflect on learning and support needs, and attach a copy of their updated GANTT chart to the report. |
|||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies |
|||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand | ||||
| All delivery modes | Report | Progress Report | 2.1 | Practiced, Assessed |
| 2.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.4 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.5 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Written Piece | Draft Research Ethics Application | 1.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |
| 1.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 1.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.4 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.5 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Draft Research Proposal | 1.1 | Practiced, Assessed | ||
| 1.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 1.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 3.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.2 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.4 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.5 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6.1 | Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
| Period and Topic | Activities |
Module 1: Research Proposal & Research Methods |
Seminar, Online Learning, and Workshops Self-Directed Research with Supervisors |
Module 2: Ethics Application & Attachments |
Seminar, Online Learning, and Workshops Self-Directed Research with Supervisors |
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Recommended | Bernadette Howlett,Teresa Gabiola Shelton,Ellen Rogo | 2020 | Evidence Based Practice for Health Professionals | n/a | Jones & Bartlett Publishers |
| Recommended | John W. Creswell,J. David Creswell | 2018 | Research Design | n/a | SAGE Publications, Incorporated |
Students will need to meet regularly with their research supervisor outside of class to obtain advice and feedback (Formative).
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
This course will be graded as Pass in a Limited Grade Course (PU) or Fail in a Limited Grade Course (UF) as per clause 5.1.1.3 and 5.1.1.4 of the Grades and Grade Point Average (GPA) - Academic Policy.
In a course eligible to use Limited Grades, all assessment items in that course are marked on a Pass/Fail basis and all assessment tasks are required to be passed for a student to successfully complete the course. Supplementary assessment is not available in courses using Limited Grades.
You must contact your Course Coordinator and provide the required documentation if you require an extension or alternate assessment.
Refer to the Assessment: Courses and Coursework Programs – Procedures.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.
For course-specific questions, contact your teaching staff or Course Coordinator.
For other enquiries or to access support, please contact Student Central: