Course Coordinator:Andrew Lang (alang1@usc.edu.au) School:School of Science, Technology and Engineering
UniSC Adelaide |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This course provides you with advanced database concepts including advanced SQL and industrial database application domains. The course expands on topics in ICT211, adds advanced SQL concepts and develops practical database programming skills. It begins with a review of the database environment, adding indexes and optimisation. The second part of the course focuses on applying the skills to real world applications including integrating databases with applications, big data, and graphing and geo-spatial databases.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Pre-recorded concept videos and associated activity | 1hr | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – In-class tutorial | 2hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
Review – Data models and ER modeling
SQL review
Advanced SQL – procedures, functions, triggers, views
Advanced SQL – performance tuning and query optimisation
Distributed database management systems
Introduction to Big data and NoSQL
Key-value databases – Redis
Graphing databases – Neo4j
Document databases – MongoDB
300 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Creation of systems. | Creative and critical thinker |
| 2 | Apply initiative to solving problems competently in the discipline. |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
| 3 | Apply written communication skills to specific problems. |
Knowledgeable Engaged |
| 4 | Apply discipline specific knowledge and skills to problems. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
| 5 | Understand sustainability issues within the discipline. | Sustainability-focussed |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
ICT211 and ICT112
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Early feedback will be provided in the weekly workshops.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Examination - not Centrally Scheduled | Individual | 10% | 60 minutes |
Week 5 | Online Test (Quiz) |
| All | 2 | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | Individual | 40% | 1000 words |
Week 9 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | Individual | 50% | 1500-2000 words |
Week 12 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Database Exam | |||||||
| Goal: | Demonstrate understanding of databases |
||||||
| Product: | Examination - not Centrally Scheduled | ||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||
| Format: | An examination will be held in week 5. This is an individual assessment |
||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||
| Generic Skills: | Problem solving, Applying technologies |
||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Database Programming | |||||||
| Goal: | Application of database programming skills to solve complex data management challenges, ensuring efficient retrieval of information for a given case/scenario. |
||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | ||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||
| Format: | Written report and database code/file. |
||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies |
||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Written report and database code/file. | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | Insightful analysis of the given problem Design completeness and accuracy Correctness and completeness of the implementation of code Effective written communication and report presentation |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Technical and Scientific, and Written Piece | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Written report and database code/file. |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Carlos Coronel,Steven Morris | 2018 | Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management | n/a | Cengage Learning |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.