Course Coordinator:Rania Shibl (rshibl@usc.edu.au) School:School of Science, Technology and Engineering
USC SydneyUSC Melbourne |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
Modern businesses are subject to varying levels of digital disruption and must adjust quickly to new conditions. These disruptive forces are usually based on new technologies that need ICT systems for effective utilization. This course discusses how these modern systems evolved over time and how the digitisation of data has changed science and business through the use of technologies aimed at supporting decision making. The course will look at the ethical implications of the widespread use of these systems and how governance frameworks are used to guide businesses in the ethical use of ICT.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 | 3hrs | Not applicable | Not Yet Determined |
To be advised
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Demonstrate and communicate a conceptual understanding of the implications of digital innovation within a business case study. |
Knowledgeable Engaged |
| 2 | Demonstrate and communicate an understanding of the ethical implications of ICT artefact development. |
Ethical Engaged |
| 3 | Communicate a clear, coherent and independent analysis of the use of data analysis tools, Decision support Systems and IT governance and IT standards and frameworks in Business. |
Creative and critical thinker Ethical |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Must be enrolled in a Postgraduate program.
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
In Week 3 of this course, a practice of the Task 1 short report will be carried out and you will be given informal feedback about your work.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 25% | 1.5 hrs |
Week 5 | In Class |
| All | 2 | Report | Individual | 25% | 2,500 words |
Week 10 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Written Piece | Individual | 50% | 2 hrs |
Week 12 | In Class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Case study report | ||||||||||
| Goal: | To analyse a business case using the work centred analysis framework. |
|||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||
| Format: | Two-page report, individual (in-class) submission. You are to write a short report outlining the changes that have occurred in a business due to digital innovation using a work centred analysis approach. |
|||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
| Generic Skills: | ||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Ethics report | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate understanding of the different methods of an ethical analysis of an ICT implementation case study.This task is being used for measuring assurance of learning towards Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) accreditation. The following Program Learning Objectives will be assessed:PLO4.1: Social Responsibility Demonstrate a capacity for a socially responsible and sustainable approach to business decisions. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Report | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | This is an individual assessment. 2,500- word report.Further details will be provided on Blackboard |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | |||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Case study analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of this task is for you to analyse an ICT business case study using a chosen ethical analysis framework.This task is being used for measuring assurance of learning towards Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) accreditation. The following Program Learning Objectives will be assessed:PLO5.1: Diversity Demonstrate an appreciation of the need to embrace and respect diversity and foster inclusivity in a business context. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | In-class written report, individual submission. You are to answer questions specific to the case study by writing a short report on relevant topics. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Reynolds | 2017 | eBook: CP1135: ICT Professional Practice | 1st ed | Cengage |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.