Course Coordinator:Quinn Edwards (qedwards@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine CoastUniSC Moreton Bay |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
Contracts B completes your studies in the Australian law of contract. In this course you will consider rules concerning performance, termination and remedies for breach and you will examine a range of factors that may impact on the enforceability of a contract. You will continue to develop your skills of case reading and analysis and your skills of statutory interpretation.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Online learning materials | 1.5hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On campus tutorial - 2 hours in Weeks 1-13 | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Mistake and non est factum
Unconscionable conduct
Illegality
Termination for Breach or Repudiation
Damages for Breach
200 Level (Developing)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Analyse facts to identify legal issues raised by those facts. | Empowered |
| 2 | Explain the correct principle(s) of law to resolve a factual problem. | Knowledgeable |
| 3 | Apply skills of legal reasoning utilising case law and statute and knowledge of Australian contract law to resolve contract disputes based on theoretical propositions and real world fact scenarios | Empowered |
| 4 | Apply skills of communicating complex legal matters in plain English | Empowered |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
LAW203 and enrolled in any Law Program
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Early feedback on progress is available in weekly hands-on tutorials, where students have an opportunity to present (and receive feedback on) responses to hypothetical advice scenarios and discussion questions.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Quiz/zes | Individual | 15% | 15 mins each |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | Online Test (Quiz) |
| All | 2 | Written Piece | Individual | 35% | 1800 words |
Week 10 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Examination - Centrally Scheduled | Individual | 50% | 3 Hours |
Exam Period | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Quiz | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to assess your ability to engage in legal analysis of simple fact scenarios based on your understanding of the legal principles governing contract law. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Quiz/zes | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Online Quizzes. You will have the opportunity to complete up to six quizzes, and of these, the three quizzes you score highest in will be counted towards your mark for this assessment. Each of these quizzes is worth a maximum of 5% of your final grade. |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Problem solving, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Contract Law Advice | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to assess your understanding and application of some of the principles of contract law and your ability to provide sound legal advice in response to a legal problem. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | This is an individual assessment of 1800 words (excl. footnotes) |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Invigilated Final Examination | ||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of the examination is to assess your understanding of the rules of contract in relation to performance, breach and remedies and to assess your capacity to apply that understanding to new fact scenarios. |
|||||||||
| Product: | Examination - Centrally Scheduled | |||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||
| Format: | This assessment task is an online, open-book and invigilated exam. You will be required to attend a live Zoom session throughout the duration of the exam and need access to a working computer, a stable internet connection, and a webcam. |
|||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving |
|||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Lindy Willmott,Sharon Christensen,Des Butler,Bill Dixon | 2018 | Contract Law | n/a | Oxford University Press, USA |
| Required | Des Butler,Sharon Christensen,Bill Dixon,Lindy Willmott | 2018 | Contract Law Casebook | n/a | Oxford University Press, USA |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.