Course Coordinator:Hester Wright (hwright@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Nutrition and Dietetics
Online |
Online | You can do this course without coming onto campus. |
Please go to usc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
In this course you will begin to apply a range of appropriate health research and evaluation methodologies in practice, inclusive of quantitative and qualitative research methods. You will gain an understanding of ethical processes and culturally safe approaches to research. The course provides a foundation for further research pathways.
Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
Online | |||
Learning materials – A combination of online materials, readings and associated activities | 1hr | Week 1 | 10 times |
Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Online workshop | 3hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
Independent Study/Research – Meetings with your group in relations to assigned course tasks. | 1hr | Week 2 | 10 times |
Introduction to research design
Reviewing and critiquing the literature
Writing a literature review
Developing a research proposal
Research methodology
Quantitative and qualitative methods
Human ethics requirements
Culturally safe approaches to research
Research in practice
500 Level (Advanced)
12 units
Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Dietitians Australia | |
1 | Assemble a critical and systematic review, analysis, consolidation and synthesis of research literature using established methods and present in a professional manner |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
1.4.4, 1.4, 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1, 3.1.4, 3.1 |
2 | Design a research project from existing identified literature gaps applying appropriate research methods and ethical principles to provide a solution to a complex nutrition problem. |
Creative and critical thinker Ethical Sustainability-focussed |
1.2.1, 1.2.3, 1.4.3, 1.2, 1.4, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.4, 3.1 |
3 | Reflect on research practice and articulate the mentoring and supervision process. |
Empowered Ethical |
1.1.3, 1.2.1, 1.3.4, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.5, 3.1 |
4 | Demonstrate recognition of cultural identities and needs of diverse populations across research practices. | Empowered |
1.5.3, 1.5 |
CODE | COMPETENCY |
Dietitians Australia | |
1.4.4 | Demonstrates management: Utilises relevant technology and equipment efficiently, effectively and safely |
1.2.1 | Demonstrates ethical and legal practice: Exercises professional duty of care in accordance with relevant codes of conduct, ethical requirements, and other accepted protocols |
1.2.3 | Demonstrates ethical and legal practice: Prepares, stores and transmits accurate and timely documentation according to accepted standards |
1.4.3 | Demonstrates management: Identifies and assesses risks, incidents and errors, follows relevant protocols, and develops basic risk, incident and error management strategies for services |
1.1.3 | Demonstrates safe practice: Consistently demonstrates reflective practice in collaboration with supervisors, peers and mentors |
1.3.4 | Demonstrates leadership: Participates in supervision, teaching and mentoring processes with peers, students and colleagues |
1.5.3 | Demonstrates cultural safety and responsiveness: Applies evidence- and strengths-based best practice approaches in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health care, valuing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing |
1.1 | Professional Practice: Demonstrates safe practice |
1.2 | Professional Practice: Demonstrates ethical and legal practice |
1.3 | Professional Practice: Demonstrates leadership |
1.4 | Professional Practice: Demonstrates management |
1.5 | Professional Practice: Demonstrates cultural safety and responsiveness |
2.1.1 | Adopts an evidence-based approach to dietetic practice: Adopts a questioning and critical approach in all aspects of practice |
2.1.3 | Adopts an evidence-based approach to dietetic practice: Systematically searches for, evaluates, interprets and applies findings from food, nutrition, dietetic, social, behavioural and education sciences into dietetic practice |
2.1 | Expert Practice: Adopts an evidence-based approach to dietetic practice |
3.1.4 | Conducts research, evaluation, and quality management processes: Accurately documents and disseminates research, evaluation, and quality-management findings |
3.1.1 | Conducts research, evaluation, and quality management processes: Identifies and selects appropriate research, evaluation and quality-management methods to advance the practice of dietetics |
3.1.2 | Conducts research, evaluation, and quality management processes: Applies ethical processes to research, evaluation, and quality management |
3.1.5 | Conducts research, evaluation, and quality management processes: Translates the implications of research findings for dietetic practice, advocacy and key stakeholders |
3.1 | Research Practice: Conducts research, evaluation, and quality management processes |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in MC001
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
In week 3 you will submit the draft aim of your literature review, a search strategy for one database, and a data extraction table including data from two relevant primary studies. This submission will include brief feedback from your research mentor. This will form the basis for Task 1: Literature review.
Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
All | 1a | Activity Participation | Group | 0% | 10 minutes |
Week 3 | In Class |
All | 1b | Artefact - Technical and Scientific | Individual | 10% | 1000 words |
Week 4 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
All | 1c | Literature Review (or component) | Group | 25% | 3000 +/- 10% words |
Week 8 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
All | 2a | Activity Participation | Individual | 0% | 10-minutes |
Week 10 | In Class |
All | 2b | Artefact - Technical and Scientific | Group | 25% | 2000 words |
Week 12 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
All | 3 | Oral | Individual | 40% | 20 - 30 minutes |
Exam Period | To be Negotiated |
All - Assessment Task 1a:Component of Literature review | ||||||||||
Goal: | To illustrate your ability to systematically identify relevant literature to answer a research question. |
|||||||||
Product: | Activity Participation | |||||||||
Format: | In class |
|||||||||
Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Applying technologies |
All - Assessment Task 1b:Critical Appraisal | ||||||||||
Goal: | To appraise, interpret and integrate existing evidence in the field of dietetic practice. |
|||||||||
Product: | Artefact - Technical and Scientific | |||||||||
Format: | Find more information in your task instruction sheet on Canvas. |
|||||||||
Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving |
All - Assessment Task 1c:Literature review | |||||||||||||
Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to provide a foundation for your research proposal. You will apply your knowledge of research principles and methods to critically and systematically review, analyse, consolidate and synthesise the literature to demonstrate a broad understanding of your allocated research topic. |
||||||||||||
Product: | Literature Review (or component) | ||||||||||||
Format: | You will be assigned a research group and topic at the beginning of the course. You will investigate the evidence using a systematic process to search credible research databases and critically review, analyse, consolidate and synthesis the literature to write a coherent well-structured literature review. |
||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Information literacy |
All - Assessment Task 2a:Component of Research Proposal | ||||||||||
Goal: | To provide an update on progress with development of your research proposal in class. |
|||||||||
Product: | Activity Participation | |||||||||
Format: | See task instruction sheet in Canvas for more information on the format. |
|||||||||
Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving |
All - Assessment Task 2b:Research proposal | |||||||||||||||||||
Goal: | Using your research topic from task 1 you will work in a group to develop and produce a research proposal. You will draw from the evidence in your literature review to provide a rationale for the research design. |
||||||||||||||||||
Product: | Artefact - Technical and Scientific | ||||||||||||||||||
Format: | Find more information of the task format in the instruction sheet on Canvas. |
||||||||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation |
All - Assessment Task 3:Oral defence | |||||||||||||
Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to demonstrate your ability to share research and information to support sound decision making and disseminate research through effective communication. This assessment task enables you to communicate and reflect on the various research tasks you undertook as part of this course. |
||||||||||||
Product: | Oral | ||||||||||||
Format: | You will participate in an interactive oral interview. You are expected to answer questions that are based on the research project you have worked on during this course. The interview will be up to 30 minutes in duration. |
||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving |
Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
---|---|---|---|---|
National Competency Standards for Dietitians in Australia (2021) | ||||
All delivery modes | Activity Participation | Component of Literature review | 1.4.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
2.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Component of Research Proposal | 3.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | ||
Artefact - Technical and Scientific | Critical Appraisal | 2.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
2.1.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Research proposal | 1.2.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | ||
1.2.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
1.4.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Literature Review (or component) | Literature review | 1.4.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
2.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
2.1.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Oral | Oral defence | 1.1.3 | Practiced, Assessed | |
1.2.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
1.3.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
1.5.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
3.1.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Please note that you need to have regular access to the resource(s) listed below. Resources may be required or recommended.
Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
Recommended | Pranee Liamputtong | 2017 | Research Methods in Health | 3rd edition | Oxford University Press, USA |
Required | John W. Creswell,J. David Creswell | 2018 | Research Design | 5th Edition. | SAGE Publications, Incorporated |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scaleYour eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying: - The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4% - The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale - You have not failed an assessment task in the course due to academic misconduct
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
UniSC is committed to a culture of respect and providing a safe and supportive environment for all members of our community. For immediate assistance on campus contact SafeUniSC by phone: 07 5430 1168 or using the SafeZone app. For general enquires contact the SafeUniSC team by phone 07 5456 3864 or email safe@usc.edu.au.
The SafeUniSC Specialist Service is a Student Wellbeing service that provides free and confidential support to students who may have experienced or observed behaviour that could cause fear, offence or trauma. To contact the service call 07 5430 1226 or email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au.
For help with course-specific advice, for example what information to include in your assessment, you should first contact your tutor, then your course coordinator, if needed.
If you require additional assistance, the Learning Advisers are trained professionals who are ready to help you develop a wide range of academic skills. Visit the Learning Advisers web page for more information, or contact Student Central for further assistance: +61 7 5430 2890 or studentcentral@usc.edu.au.
Student Wellbeing provide free and confidential counselling on a wide range of personal, academic, social and psychological matters, to foster positive mental health and wellbeing for your academic success.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 1226.
Ability Advisers ensure equal access to all aspects of university life. If your studies are affected by a disability, learning disorder mental health issue, injury or illness, or you are a primary carer for someone with a disability or who is considered frail and aged, AccessAbility Services can provide access to appropriate reasonable adjustments and practical advice about the support and facilities available to you throughout the University.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email AccessAbility@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 2890.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.