Course Coordinator:Jane Taylor (jtaylor6@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Public Health
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This foundation course will develop your foundation knowledge of health promotion, and skills in critiquing health promotion practice and engaging in professional advocacy. You will learn about the development of health promotion, professional competencies, core concepts and theory, and the underlying values and principles from critical through to selective health promotion approaches. You will apply your health promotion knowledge and skills to critique health promotion initiatives for evidence of, and advocate for best practice.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Independent structured learning materials | 2hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On-campus workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 12 times |
Development of health promotion
Health promotion professional competencies
Health and wellbeing determinants
Health promotion priorities including climate and health, and the SDGs
Health promotion concepts, values and principles
Health promotion models and settings
Health promotion approaches
Cultural Safety in health promotion practice
Health promotion professional advocacy
200 Level (Developing)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| 1 | Critically reflect on core health promotion theory, concepts and skills. |
Knowledgeable Ethical Communication Collaboration |
A.1, B.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, A.9 |
| 2 | Critique health promotion action using values and principles evident in health promotion practice. |
Empowered Ethical Collaboration Problem solving Applying technologies |
B.2, B.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, A.8, 6.3 |
| 3 | Advocate for a best practice health promotion approach. |
Empowered Ethical Problem solving Information literacy |
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 6.3 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| A.1 | Health as a human right, which is central to human development |
| B.1 | The concepts, principles and ethical values of health promotion as defined by the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (WHO, 1986) and subsequent charters and declarations |
| A.2 | Respect for the rights, dignity, confidentiality and worth of individuals and groups |
| B.2 | The concepts of health equity, social justice and health as a human right as the basis for health promotion action |
| A.3 | Respect for all aspects of diversity including gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, disability, ethnicity, race, and cultural beliefs |
| B.3 | The determinants of health and their implications for health promotion action |
| A.4 | Addressing health inequities, social injustice, and prioritising the needs of those experiencing poverty and social marginalisation |
| A.5 | Addressing the political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, behavioural and biological determinants of health and wellbeing |
| A.6 | Ensuring that health promotion action is beneficial and causes no harm |
| A.8 | Seeking the best available information and evidence needed to implement effective policies and programmes that influence health |
| A.9 | The empowerment of individuals and groups to build autonomy and self respect as the basis for health promotion action |
| 2.1 | Use advocacy strategies and techniques which reflect health promotion principles |
| 2.2 | Engage with and influence key stakeholders to develop and sustain health promotion action |
| 2.3 | Raise awareness of and influence public opinion on health issues |
| 2.4 | Advocate across sectors for the development of policies, guidelines and procedures across all sectors which impact positively on health and reduce health inequities |
| 6.3 | Collect, review and appraise relevant data, information and literature to inform health promotion action |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Must have completed 48 units of any program
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
You will be provided with formative feedback for Task 1 in week 3, and practice examples for Tasks 2 and 3.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 25% | 1000 word written reflection on health promotion concepts |
Week 4 | Online Submission |
| All | 2 | Artefact - Professional | Group | 35% | Completion of template + 15 minute in class facilitated meeting |
Week 8 | In Class |
| All | 3 | Artefact - Professional | Individual | 40% | Conference poster presentation with 5 minutes discussion and questions |
Week 12 | In Class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Health promotion reflection | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in engaging with and reflecting on health promotion discipline knowledge and scholarly literature required for professional practice. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Structured reflection is an important lifelong professional learning skill that in this task will assist you to learn about foundation health promotion discipline knowledge required for professional practice. Individually you will complete a 1000 word written reflection on key health promotion concepts using prescribed readings and a structured reflection framework. The reflection will enable you to consolidate knowledge required for Tasks two and three. You will be provided with formative feedback in week three in class. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Stakeholder engagement plan and facilitated meeting | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your professional skills in developing a stakeholder engagement plan for a health promotion program and meeting facilitation skills. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Health promotion involves planning to engage relevant stakeholders in health promotion action. This includes identifying who the key stakeholders are and their interests in a program, and developing a plan to meaningfully engage them including making contact, building relationships, and facilitating their participation. In this task you will work in small groups to develop a written stakeholder engagement plan for a hypothetical health promotion program you are developing, and facilitate an initial stakeholder meeting. Further details will be available on Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Health promotion practice critique | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in critiquing health promotion action using the underlying values and principles of health promotion, and advocating for a best practice approach. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Health promotion practitioners are required to critically reflect on and advocate for health programs and policies to ensure alignment with best practice. Individually you will: 1. Choose one published peer reviewed health promotion program within the last five years of interest to you. You will need to confirm with the course coordinator that the program you select is appropriate. 2. Use best practice health promotion values and principles to conduct your critique and present findings via a conference poster that is supported by relevant scholarly literature. 4. Present your conference poster in class and participate in an oral discussion which will include responding to questions about your critique findings and recommendations. Further details will be available on Canvas. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies |
||||||||||||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The CompHP Core Competencies Framework for Health Promotion 2011 | ||||
| All delivery modes | Artefact - Professional | Stakeholder engagement plan and facilitated meeting | 1.1 | Taught |
| 1.2 | Taught | |||
| 1.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 2.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Health promotion practice critique | 1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | ||
| 1.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 1.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Written Piece | Health promotion reflection | A.1 | Assessed | |
| A.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| A.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| A.6 | Taught | |||
| B.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.
For course-specific questions, contact your teaching staff or Course Coordinator.
For other enquiries or to access support, please contact Student Central: