Course Coordinator:Jane Taylor (jtaylor6@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Public Health
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to usc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This foundation course will develop your foundation knowledge of health promotion, and skills in critiquing health promotion practice and engaging in professional advocacy. You will learn about the development of health promotion, professional competencies, core concepts and theory, and the underlying values and principles from critical through to selective health promotion approaches. You will apply your health promotion knowledge and skills to critique health promotion initiatives for evidence of, and advocate for best practice.
Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
Blended learning | |||
Learning materials – Independent structured learning materials | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On-campus workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Development of health promotion
Health promotion professional competencies
Health and wellbeing determinants
Health promotion priorities including climate and health, and the SDGs
Health promotion concepts, values and principles
Health promotion models and frameworks
Health promotion approaches
Cultural safety in health promotion practice
Health promotion professional advocacy
200 Level (Developing)
12 units
Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
1 | Critically reflect on core health promotion theory, concepts and skills. |
Knowledgeable Ethical Communication Collaboration |
A.1, B.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, A.9 |
2 | Critique health promotion action using values and principles evident in health promotion practice. |
Empowered Ethical Collaboration Problem solving Applying technologies |
B.2, B.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, A.8, 6.3 |
3 | Advocate for a best practice health promotion approach. |
Empowered Ethical Problem solving Information literacy |
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 6.3 |
CODE | COMPETENCY |
International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
A.1 | Health as a human right, which is central to human development |
B.1 | The concepts, principles and ethical values of health promotion as defined by the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (WHO, 1986) and subsequent charters and declarations |
A.2 | Respect for the rights, dignity, confidentiality and worth of individuals and groups |
B.2 | The concepts of health equity, social justice and health as a human right as the basis for health promotion action |
A.3 | Respect for all aspects of diversity including gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, disability, ethnicity, race, and cultural beliefs |
B.3 | The determinants of health and their implications for health promotion action |
A.4 | Addressing health inequities, social injustice, and prioritising the needs of those experiencing poverty and social marginalisation |
A.5 | Addressing the political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, behavioural and biological determinants of health and wellbeing |
A.6 | Ensuring that health promotion action is beneficial and causes no harm |
A.8 | Seeking the best available information and evidence needed to implement effective policies and programmes that influence health |
A.9 | The empowerment of individuals and groups to build autonomy and self respect as the basis for health promotion action |
2.1 | Use advocacy strategies and techniques which reflect health promotion principles |
2.2 | Engage with and influence key stakeholders to develop and sustain health promotion action |
2.3 | Raise awareness of and influence public opinion on health issues |
2.4 | Advocate across sectors for the development of policies, guidelines and procedures across all sectors which impact positively on health and reduce health inequities |
6.3 | Collect, review and appraise relevant data, information and literature to inform health promotion action |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
You will be provided with formative feedback for Task 1 in week 3, and practice examples for Tasks 2 and 3.
Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 30% | Part A: 1000 word written reflection on health promotion concepts (individual); worth 20% Part B: 10 minute - Small group facilitation activity (group); worth 10% |
Refer to Format | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
All | 2 | Artefact - Creative, and Oral | Individual | 35% | Conference oral presentation - 15 minutes (including 2 minutes questions) |
Week 8 | In Class |
All | 3 | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | Individual | 35% | 1200 words |
Week 13 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
All - Assessment Task 1:Health promotion reflection and facilitation | |||||||||||||||||||
Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in engaging with and reflecting on health promotion discipline knowledge and scholarly literature required for professional practice, and small group facilitation. |
||||||||||||||||||
Product: | Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
Format: | Part A: Structured reflection is an important lifelong professional learning skill that in this task will assist you to learn about foundation health promotion discipline knowledge required for professional practice. Individually you will complete a 1000 word written reflection on key health promotion concepts using prescribed readings and a structured reflection framework. The reflection will enable you to consolidate knowledge required to complete Tasks two and three. You will be provided with formative feedback in week three in class. Part A will be due in Week 4. Part B: Facilitate a small group facilitated activity on a health promotion concept addressed in Part A. You will collaborate with your team members to develop and deliver the facilitated small group activity. Details about the format and requirements for parts A and B for this task will be made available on Canvas. Part B will be due in Week 5. |
||||||||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration |
All - Assessment Task 2:Health promotion practice critique | |||||||||||||||||||
Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in critiquing health promotion action using the underlying values and principles of health promotion best practice. |
||||||||||||||||||
Product: | Artefact - Creative, and Oral | ||||||||||||||||||
Format: | Health promotion is a field that requires practitioners to critique health and wellbeing related programs and policies to ensure best practice. In small groups you will: 1. Choose one published peer reviewed health promotion program within the last five years of interest to you. You will need to confirm with the course coordinator that the program you select is appropriate. 2. Use best practice health promotion values and principles to conduct your critique and present findings via an oral conference presentation. Support your critique with relevant scholarly literature (including prescribed readings). 4. Deliver you oral presentation in-class. You will collaborate with your team members to undertake the critique and deliver the oral presentation. Further details on the critique framework and professional oral presentation requirements will be available on Canvas. Submit in class: Week eight (8) |
||||||||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Collaboration, Problem solving, Applying technologies |
All - Assessment Task 3:Professional advocacy report | |||||||||||||||||||
Goal: | To demonstrate your professional skills in advocating for a best practice health promotion approach. |
||||||||||||||||||
Product: | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
Format: | Health promotion action involves practitioners proactively responding to proposed health and wellbeing policy initiatives to ensure evidence of their effectiveness including alignment with best practice. This type of work is a form of professional advocacy most often undertaken on behalf of an organisation or professional body such as the Australian Health Promotion Association. Written responses, often referred to as submissions are compiled and submitted to government bodies responsible for the related policies and strategies to consider, for example, the National Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Strategy. In this task you will develop a written professional advocacy report for an organisation that you hypothetically work for on a current national or state level health and well-being policy or strategy to ensure the policy or strategy is based on best practice health promotion using health promotion values and principles and supported by the relevant scholarly literature. Further information about how to prepare the advocacy report will be made available on Canvas. |
||||||||||||||||||
Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Generic Skills: | Problem solving, Information literacy |
Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
---|---|---|---|---|
The CompHP Core Competencies Framework for Health Promotion 2011 | ||||
All delivery modes | Artefact - Creative, and Oral | Health promotion practice critique | 6.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
A.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.8 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
B.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
B.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
B.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | Professional advocacy report | 2.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
2.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
2.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
2.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
6.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.8 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
B.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
Written Piece | Health promotion reflection and facilitation | A.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
A.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A.6 | Taught | |||
A.9 | Taught | |||
B.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
UniSC is committed to a culture of respect and providing a safe and supportive environment for all members of our community. For immediate assistance on campus contact SafeUniSC by phone: 07 5430 1168 or using the SafeZone app. For general enquires contact the SafeUniSC team by phone 07 5456 3864 or email safe@usc.edu.au.
The SafeUniSC Specialist Service is a Student Wellbeing service that provides free and confidential support to students who may have experienced or observed behaviour that could cause fear, offence or trauma. To contact the service call 07 5430 1226 or email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au.
For help with course-specific advice, for example what information to include in your assessment, you should first contact your tutor, then your course coordinator, if needed.
If you require additional assistance, the Learning Advisers are trained professionals who are ready to help you develop a wide range of academic skills. Visit the Learning Advisers web page for more information, or contact Student Central for further assistance: +61 7 5430 2890 or studentcentral@usc.edu.au.
Student Wellbeing provide free and confidential counselling on a wide range of personal, academic, social and psychological matters, to foster positive mental health and wellbeing for your academic success.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email studentwellbeing@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 1226.
Ability Advisers ensure equal access to all aspects of university life. If your studies are affected by a disability, learning disorder mental health issue, injury or illness, or you are a primary carer for someone with a disability or who is considered frail and aged, AccessAbility Services can provide access to appropriate reasonable adjustments and practical advice about the support and facilities available to you throughout the University.
To book a confidential appointment go to Student Hub, email AccessAbility@usc.edu.au or call 07 5430 2890.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.