Course Coordinator:Kara Lilly (klilly@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Public Health
UniSC Sunshine Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
In this course you will develop the knowledge and skills to navigate the policymaking environments that influence health equity outcomes, including the role of political ideologies, evidence, power and privilege. You will learn about the role of healthy public policy, theories of the policy process, and use advocacy strategies to gain political commitment, policy support, social acceptance and systems support to create health and well-being and health inequity.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Independent structured learning materials | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Workshop (on campus) | 2hrs | Week 1 | 13 times |
Healthy public policy
Policy process
Health in All Policies (HiAP)
Political ideology and globalisation
Power and privilege
Public health advocacy
Advocacy framing
200 Level (Developing)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| 1 | Discuss how healthy public policy contributes to health equity outcomes. | Creative and critical thinker |
B.2, B.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, B.10, 4.1, 5.2 |
| 2 | Analyse the policymaking environment to influence healthy public policy. | Sustainability-focussed |
A.3, A.5, B.6, A.8, B.10, 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 7.2 |
| 3 | Advocate for healthy public policy across a range of stakeholder audiences. | Empowered |
B.2, B.6, B.9, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| B.2 | The concepts of health equity, social justice and health as a human right as the basis for health promotion action |
| B.3 | The determinants of health and their implications for health promotion action |
| A.3 | Respect for all aspects of diversity including gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, disability, ethnicity, race, and cultural beliefs |
| A.4 | Addressing health inequities, social injustice, and prioritising the needs of those experiencing poverty and social marginalisation |
| A.5 | Addressing the political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, behavioural and biological determinants of health and wellbeing |
| A.6 | Ensuring that health promotion action is beneficial and causes no harm |
| B.6 | The current theories and evidence which underpin effective leadership, advocacy and partnership building and their implication for health promotion action |
| A.8 | Seeking the best available information and evidence needed to implement effective policies and programmes that influence health |
| B.9 | The communication processes and current information technology required for effective health promotion action |
| B.10 | The systems, policies and legislation which impact on health and their relevance for health promotion. |
| 1.1 | Work collaboratively across sectors to influence the development of public policies which impact positively on health and reduce health inequities |
| 1.2 | Use health promotion approaches which support empowerment, participation, partnership and equity to create environments and settings which promote health |
| 2.1 | Use advocacy strategies and techniques which reflect health promotion principles |
| 2.2 | Engage with and influence key stakeholders to develop and sustain health promotion action |
| 2.3 | Raise awareness of and influence public opinion on health issues |
| 2.4 | Advocate across sectors for the development of policies, guidelines and procedures across all sectors which impact positively on health and reduce health inequities |
| 4.1 | Use effective communication skills including written, verbal, nonverbal, and listening skills |
| 4.2 | Use information technology and other media to receive and disseminate health promotion information |
| 4.3 | Use culturally appropriate communication methods and techniques for specific groups and settings |
| 4.4 | Use interpersonal communication and groupwork skills to facilitate individuals, groups, communities and organisations to improve health and reduce health inequities. |
| 5.2 | Use leadership skills which facilitate empowerment and participation (including team work, negotiation, motivation, conflict resolution, decision-making, facilitation and problem solving) |
| 7.2 | Use current models and systematic approaches for planning health promotion action |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Not applicable
Not applicable
PUB704 and PUB742
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Early feedback will be provided via online formative quizzes and case study example activities across the semester to consolidate understanding of course concepts and skills for assessment.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Artefact - Professional | Individual | 25% | 600 words |
Week 4 | Online Discussion Board |
| All | 2 | Oral | Group | 35% | 8-10 minutes |
Week 9 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check and in class |
| All | 3 | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | Individual | 40% | Written advocacy plan and two (2) advocacy products (approx. 1200 words) |
Exam Period | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Healthy public policy critique | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | To facilitate and participate in a critical evaluation of an existing healthy public policy to address health equity. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | You will work individually to lead and contribute to an online discussion forum. Further details regarding participation in the discussion forum will be made available on Canvas. |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Collaboration, Applying technologies |
||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Policy planning analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in investigating the policymaking environment of a given context. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Oral | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | In groups, you will investigate the factors that influence healthy public policy in a given context. You will present your policy analysis via a presentation in a professional meeting format. Further details on how to approach and complete the policy planning analysis will be available on Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Collaboration, Problem solving, Applying technologies |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Advocacy plan and products | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your knowledge and skills in developing an advocacy plan to advocate for a healthy public policy. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will work individually to research, produce and justify an advocacy plan and two (2) advocacy products to advocate for a healthy public policy. Further details on how to approach and complete this advocacy plan will be available on Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Applying technologies |
|||||||||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The CompHP Core Competencies Framework for Health Promotion 2011 | ||||
| All delivery modes | Artefact - Professional | Healthy public policy critique | A.5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
| B.2 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Artefact - Professional, and Written Piece | Advocacy plan and products | 2.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 2.4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Oral | Policy planning analysis | 1.1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.