Course Coordinator:Katharina Merollini (kmerolli@usc.edu.au) School:School of Health - Public Health
Online |
Online | You can do this course without coming onto campus, unless your program has specified a mandatory onsite requirement. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This course introduces key concepts in health economics relevant for economic evaluation, such as (cost-)effectiveness, equity, and efficacy. You will learn about the importance of economic evaluation for health care and public health decision making in the context of limited resources and competing demands. You will acquire knowledge and skills in different economic evaluation methods, including relevant steps in study design, interpretation of results, and how economic evidence can be used for public policy priority setting and resource allocation.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Online | |||
| Online – 5 hours of structured online learning materials plus optional 1-hour online consultation session | 6hrs | Week 1 | 8 times |
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| 1 | Apply health economic theory and concepts to the Australian health care and public health contexts. |
Knowledgeable Empowered Engaged |
A.5, A.10, A.11, 9.1, 9.5 |
| 2 | Determine contemporary economic evaluation methods and design components of economic evaluations. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Ethical |
A.6, B.6, A.8, B.8, B.10, A.11, 6.2, 6.3, 8.2, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4 |
| 3 | Critically appraise and reflect on the strengths and limitations of health economic evidence in informing decision making and policy design. |
Knowledgeable Empowered Sustainability-focussed |
A.5, A.8, A.10, B.10, A.11, 6.2, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| International Union for Health Promotion and Education | |
| A.5 | Addressing the political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, behavioural and biological determinants of health and wellbeing |
| A.6 | Ensuring that health promotion action is beneficial and causes no harm |
| B.6 | The current theories and evidence which underpin effective leadership, advocacy and partnership building and their implication for health promotion action |
| A.8 | Seeking the best available information and evidence needed to implement effective policies and programmes that influence health |
| B.8 | The evidence base and research methods, including qualitative and quantitative methods, required to inform and evaluate health promotion action |
| A.10 | Sustainable development and sustainable health promotion action |
| B.10 | The systems, policies and legislation which impact on health and their relevance for health promotion. |
| A.11 | Being accountable for the quality of one's own practice and taking responsibility for maintaining and improving knowledge and skills |
| 6.2 | Use a variety of assessment methods including quantitative and qualitative research methods |
| 6.3 | Collect, review and appraise relevant data, information and literature to inform health promotion action |
| 8.2 | Develop, pilot and use appropriate resources and materials |
| 9.1 | Identify and use appropriate health promotion evaluation tools and research methods |
| 9.2 | Integrate evaluation into the planning and implementation of all health promotion action |
| 9.3 | Use evaluation findings to refine and improve health promotion action |
| 9.4 | Use research and evidence-based strategies to inform practice |
| 9.5 | Contribute to the development and dissemination of health promotion evaluation and research processes |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in any postgraduate program
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
You will be provided with practice opportunities in week 2 to help you prepare for Task 1.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 35% | 1200 words |
Week 3 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 2 | Written Piece | Individual | 65% | 2000 words |
Week 8 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Economic evaluation study critical appraisal | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in the critical appraisal of a health economic evaluation. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Critical assessment, using the knowledge and skills gained throughout the course, to critique a published health economic study which will be allocated to you. More details will be provided in Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Economic evaluation design | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your skills in designing a health economic evaluation. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will design an evidence-based health economic evaluation. More details will be provided in Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation |
|||||||||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The CompHP Core Competencies Framework for Health Promotion 2011 | ||||
| All delivery modes | Written Piece | Economic evaluation study critical appraisal | 9.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
| B.7 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| B.8 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Economic evaluation design | 9.3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | ||
| B.8 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| B.10 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
| Period and Topic | Activities |
n/a |
n/a |
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Michael Drummond,Mark J. Sculpher,Karl Claxton,Greg L. Stoddart,George W. Torrance | 2015 | Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes | 4th | Oxford University Press, USA |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.