Course Coordinator:Peter Innes (pinnes@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine CoastUniSC Moreton Bay |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This course equips you with the knowledge and skills needed to evaluate, undertake and commission social research. In order to critically understand how social data are produced, analysed and interpreted, the connections between epistemological underpinnings, theoretical orientations, methodology and methods are explored. You will formulate and design a research proposal and undertake practical key research methods. Debates concerning the relationship of science to social research, ethics, the power and purposes of research and research with minorities and marginalised groups are examined.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Online Learning Materials | 1hr | Week 1 | 13 times |
| Laboratory 1 – Workshops are held in the PC computer labs | 2hrs | Week 1 | 10 times |
Foundations of Social Research: Methodology and Methods
Sampling
Human Ethics and Social Research
Survey design and analysis
Interviewing Methods and analysis
Content and Discourse Analysis
Practice and Evaluation
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Critical understanding of the nature and purposes of social research and its contribution to knowledge and theory in the social sciences. |
Knowledgeable Empowered |
1, 5, 9 |
| 2 | Critical understanding of current methodological debates and issues in social research and the ethical dimensions of research practice |
Knowledgeable Ethical |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
| 3 | Formulate researchable question and conceptualise and articulate research problems | Creative and critical thinker |
5, 6 |
| 4 | Develop and design a coherent research strategy to answer a research question |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
1, 5, 6 |
| 5 | Design surveys, analyse and interpret quantitative data using data analysis software |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered Applying technologies |
5, 6 |
| 6 | Critical awareness as professionals of the ways in which social research informs professional practice and the ethical, moral and political responsibilities that follow from this |
Ethical Engaged |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 |
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Practice Standard 1: AASW Code of Ethics |
| 2 | Practice Standard 2: Working alongside Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples |
| 3 | Practice Standard 3: Human rights and social justice |
| 4 | Practice Standard 4: Culture, identity and intersectionality |
| 5 | Practice Standard 5: Critical thinking in practice |
| 6 | Practice Standard 6: Exercising professional judgement |
| 7 | Practice Standard 7: Professional identity |
| 9 | Practice Standard 9: Professional growth |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in a Postgraduate Program
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Timely and detailed feedback is provided for each assessment. Feedback is provided both within text and general comments to build scholarly skills. Students are able to seek feedback through face-to-face discussion with the course coordinator. Tutorials will include extended discussion and review of the assessment task requirements and scope.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Written Piece | Individual | 25% | 500 words (excluding references) |
Week 5 | Online Submission |
| All | 2 | Artefact - Professional | Individual | 45% | Design and produce a working online survey. Provide additional short-answer submission to two questions (50-100 words each); one each regarding a quantitative and a qualitative research question example. See assessment Task 2 instructions for required structure and length. |
Week 9 | Online Submission |
| All | 3 | Quiz/zes | Individual | 30% | Survey data is provided, and questions to be answered are provided with the data. See assessment Task 3 for detail. |
Week 13 | Online Submission |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Own Research Concept | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To demonstrate your capacity to conceptualise and articulate a research concept. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Written essay, uploaded, format structured as per the assessment Task 1 information in Canvas. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Method (Survey Design) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To critically apply your knowledge to specific method-oriented questions to demonstrate you understand the basic concepts |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Professional | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | A working (published and accessible) online survey link is submitted to the Task 2 submission area. Limited additional textual information (word docx) will be required (no referencing required) relating to a specific quantitative research question relating two survey questions (as "Independent" and "Dependent" variables); as well as a specific qualitative research question and the identification of the focal concept(s) used in the development of the two open-ended survey questions. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Survey Data Analysis | ||||||||||
| Goal: | To critically apply your knowledge to demonstrate your capacity to analyse and interpret research data using data analysis software |
|||||||||
| Product: | Quiz/zes | |||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||
| Format: | You are required to correctly complete and submit answers to the data analysis task questions provided. This involves using computer software (either in USC Laboratories, or through online access via USC's virtual machine access). When ready, the answers are to be entered into the online submission area. |
|||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Problem solving, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) | ||||
| All delivery modes | Artefact - Professional | Method (Survey Design) | 1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 7 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Quiz/zes | Survey Data Analysis | 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Written Piece | Own Research Concept | 1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 7 | Taught, Practiced | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | Maggie Walter | 2019 | Social Research Methods | n/a | Oxford University Press, USA |
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.