Course Coordinator:Dyann Ross (dross@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine CoastUniSC Fraser Coast |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
In this course, students explore and develop their anti-oppressive ethics, knowledge and skills in group-based practice in complex scenario-based and real life case studies. To enhance an appreciation of the interplay between the structural, cultural and nuanced interactive nature of power in professional social work practice, students will engage with immersive technologies and other creative media as appropriate.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Lecture – 1 hour Live Online Lecture - for timetabling | 1hr | Week 1 | 13 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On campus Tutorial - 2 Hours | 2hrs | Week 2 | 12 times |
Students will -
Explore the nature of anti-oppressive group work strategies in social work;
In particular, they will explore the nature of therapeutic, educational, activist research and identity
based social action groups as well as group-based strategies undertaken by teams within human
service organisations and the community context;
Develop an understanding of the complexity of personal, socio-historical, political, environmental,
administrative and legislative dimensions of social issues & the value of group-based approaches in
addressing these issues;
Develop anti-oppressive skills and strategies for group-based practice, including group facilitation
skills, critical thinking & power-equalising processes and working with conflict and complexity;
Develop an anti-oppressive ethical use of self through critical reflection, including an exploration of
their personal values, positionality and power in practice scenarios.
300 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | |
| 1 | Identify and describe different types of collective action for social change and their theoretical underpinnings, processes and practices as they relate to diverse population groups and complex human services environments. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
| 2 | Apply knowledge of the historical, environmental, administrative and legislative context to collective action processes utilised in human service settings. |
Knowledgeable Engaged |
| 3 | Identify and evaluate foundational processes and considerations for collective action and demonstrate a collective action exercise based on critical practice principles. |
Knowledgeable Engaged |
| 4 | Generate principles for future professional practice through critical reflection of use of self in collective action processes. |
Ethical Engaged |
| 5 | Apply anti-oppressive and ethical practice frameworks to diverse collective action processes. |
Ethical Engaged |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
(SWK172, SCS272 or SCS172) or (SCS180 or SCS280)
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Assessment 1 will be developed in tutorials and students can obtain feedback on drafts of their diagrams.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Artefact - Creative | Individual | 30% | 2000 words equivalent |
Week 6 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 2 | Plan | Individual or Group | 35% | 2500 words |
Week 10 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 3 | Oral | Individual or Group | 35% | 30 mins (max) |
Refer to Format | In Class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Develop a diagram of a model of group-based anti-oppressive practice | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | To create a diagram of a model of group-based anti-oppressive practice. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Creative | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will distil relevant material from the course references to create a diagram that depicts your own model of group-based anti-oppressive practice. Some examples will be given in tutorials and students can collaborate on developing their ideas but must do their own diagram. Concepts and processes need to be explained and located in the course literature through appropriate referencing. An on-line mapping tool will be provided as one way of preparing the diagram. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Proposal for an anti-oppressive response to provided case study | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | Proposal for an anti-oppressive response to a scenario within the Yarloop case study. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Plan | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will distil relevant material from the course materials to develop a proposal and for an anti-oppressive group-based response to a scenario within the Yarloop case study. Students will be provided with a planning tool that involves answering the following questions – What is the ecojustice issue? Why is it an ecojustice issue? Who are the parties involved in the situation? What are their views and authority? What are the ecojustice goals? How will you respond to the ecojustice issue? Where and when? |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Justification and defense of proposal for an anti-oppressive response to provided case study | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | Justification and defense of proposal for an anti-oppressive response to provided case study. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Oral | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | You will reflect on your model and proposal to prepare for an oral justification of your ideas and strategies. You can prepare notes to refer to and will attend a meeting with your tutor and a representative from the Yarloop community. There will be opportunities to have contact with the representative prior to this meeting. The questions you will need to respond to will be provided and you need to show you can utilise course materials to explain and justify the proposal. You also need to show that you can receive feedback and show ways to improve your proposal. The orals will occur in two latter weeks of semester. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Information regarding prescribed texts or other associated resources will be made available on the BlackBoard site prior to commencement of study.
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.