Course Coordinator:Melissa Dor (mdor@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
UniSC Sunshine CoastUniSC Moreton Bay |
Blended learning | Most of your course is on campus but you may be able to do some components of this course online. |
Online |
Online | You can do this course without coming onto campus, unless your program has specified a mandatory onsite requirement. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
This course invites you to understand and reflect on social work practice, and the implications these have for critically reflective and context responsive social work practice. You will build on, extend and apply previous knowledge to social work theory and practice processes, ethics, and legal and organisational dimensions of practice. You will investigate, critically reflect on, and articulate practice responses to complex scenarios. The course will develop your understanding and generic skills as a social work practitioner around practice in diverse and complex contexts.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Blended learning | |||
| Learning materials – Learning resources provided online | 1hr | Week 1 | 11 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – On campus tutorial/workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 11 times |
| Online | |||
| Learning materials – Learning resources provided online | 1hr | Week 1 | 11 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – Online tutorial/workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 11 times |
Anti-oppressive ethical positionality and context responsive practice
Nonviolence and ecojustice ethics
Skills, strategies & processes around complexities in practice
Socio-political & legal contexts of practice
Organisational contexts of practice
Eco-social work
Social work practice with social justice at micro-messo-macro level
Anti-oppressive leadership
Self care, supervision and professional collaborations
[Mature content across all topics]
400 Level (Graduate)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Demonstrated and apply a comprehensive understanding of theoretical developments regarding social work practice in complex contexts |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| 2 | Identify and critically analyse complex and context specific aspects of practice scenarios from various perspectives (legal ethical, organisational), drawing on relevant theories, models, concepts and evidence. | Ethical |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| 3 | Demonstrate and apply context responsive responses to complex client situations which reflect core social work values and processes |
Creative and critical thinker Ethical Problem solving |
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 |
| 4 | Develop a critical, reflective and collaborative process for on-going context responsive practice | Sustainability-focussed |
1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| 5 | Identify and critically engage with complexity located in your own practice experience |
Knowledgeable Engaged Communication Problem solving |
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| 6 | Demonstrate the ability to be an active learning and to engage in tutorial discussions and activities. |
Creative and critical thinker Empowered Ethical Engaged Collaboration |
9
|
| 7 | Demonstrate the ability to work effectively with others in a group environment and contribute to the group process. |
Empowered Ethical Engaged Collaboration |
7
|
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Practice Standard 1: AASW Code of Ethics |
| 2 | Practice Standard 2: Working alongside Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples |
| 3 | Practice Standard 3: Human rights and social justice |
| 4 | Practice Standard 4: Culture, identity and intersectionality |
| 5 | Practice Standard 5: Critical thinking in practice |
| 6 | Practice Standard 6: Exercising professional judgement |
| 7 | Practice Standard 7: Professional identity |
| 8 | Practice Standard 8: Professional supervision |
| 9 | Practice Standard 9: Professional growth |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
SWK201 or SWK301 or SWK300 and enrolled in Program AR303, AR362, AR363 or AR372
Not applicable
Not applicable
Completion of at least one placement or prior field experience
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Students can work on their assessments in allocated class times and receive feedback
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Activity Participation | Individual | 10% | 11 tutorials |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | In Class |
| All | 2 | Oral and Written Piece | Individual and Group | 50% | Group segment involves a 20 minute in tutorial presentation. The written piece is to be 1,000 words in length. |
Refer to Format | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check and in class |
| All | 3 | Report | Individual | 40% | 2500 words |
Week 12 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check and in class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Tutorial attendance and participation | ||||||||||
| Goal: | Participation at tutorials is strongly advised as this will support your preparation for Task 2 and Task 3. AASW external accreditation requires mandatory attendance for skills based tutorials. Students must attend weekly tutorials and actively participate in all tutorial activities. |
|||||||||
| Product: | Activity Participation | |||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||
| Format: | Tutorial attendance will be recorded to meet external AASW accreditation requirements. Student participation and engagement in tutorial activities is assessed based upon attendance and participation across 11 tutorials. |
|||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Information literacy |
|||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Applied Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to critically analyse a complex practice issue. You will consider institutional responses, systemic issues and social work ethics, focusing on dignity, justice, and accountability. Drawing on relevant professional frameworks and intervention methods, the analysis aims to explore the implications of these issues for practice, policy, and systemic reform. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Oral and Written Piece | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | During tutorials, group: The presentation may use powerpoint, video or other format, and each student needs to demonstrate an active contribution to the presentation. Reference list to be provided of sources drawn upon in the presentation and to be uploaded as part of the individual piece for each student. Individual component involves a 1,000 word written statement with references, submitted on Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Critical case analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | The goal of this assessment is to conduct a critical analysis of a selected case, examining the ethical, legal, and systemic dimensions of the institutional response. The report aims to evaluate the case using relevant theoretical frameworks and professional standards, and to identify implications for practice, policy, and future responses in similar contexts. |
|||||||||||||||
| Product: | Report | |||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||
| Format: | Submit online via Canvas with a plagiarism check. |
|||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) | ||||
| All delivery modes | Activity Participation | Tutorial attendance and participation | 1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 7 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 8 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Oral and Written Piece | Applied Analysis | 1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 7 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Report | Critical case analysis | 1 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 2 | Taught, Assessed | |||
| 3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 7 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 8 | Taught, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
Nil
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.
For course-specific questions, contact your teaching staff or Course Coordinator.
For other enquiries or to access support, please contact Student Central: