Course Coordinator:Vinathe Sharma-Brymer (vsharmabrymer@usc.edu.au) School:School of Law and Society
Online |
Online | You can do this course without coming onto campus, unless your program has specified a mandatory onsite requirement. |
Please go to unisc.edu.au for up to date information on the
teaching sessions and campuses where this course is usually offered.
Many issues that the world currently faces are related to international and global dimensions of development and well-being. It is necessary that social workers understand international and global aspects for professional response. This course equips students with relevant knowledge and skills of international and global social work education and practice from social development and well-being foundations. It prepares them to critically comprehend, reflect on, and analyse international issues, organisations, the UN programs and Conventions, and practice at different levels. In doing all these, the course engages students to propose social work interventions to address international and global issues with local and global approaches.
| Activity | Hours | Beginning Week | Frequency |
| Online | |||
| Learning materials – 12*1hr Online learning | 1hr | Week 1 | 12 times |
| Tutorial/Workshop 1 – 12*2hr online workshop | 2hrs | Week 1 | 10 times |
700 Level (Specialised)
12 units
| Course Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this course, you should be able to... | Graduate Qualities Mapping Completing these tasks successfully will contribute to you becoming... | Professional Standard Mapping * Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Critically assess and explain theories and concepts underpinning the idea of international social work. | Knowledgeable |
3, 4, 5, 9 |
| 2 | Critically investigate the contemporary fields of international social work and apply international social work knowledge and skills innovatively to produce social work intervention in those fields. |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
3, 4, 5, 6 |
| 3 | Identify international social work organisations and other relevant institutions involved in the international social work fields and critically evaluate their contributions |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker |
3, 4, 5, 6 |
| 4 | Ability to engage with others and critically and culturally explore about international social work issues and interventions |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered Communication |
5, 6, 9 |
| 5 | Critically research and present both orally and in writing about international social work issues and interventions |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered Communication Problem solving |
1, 5, 6, 9 |
| 6 | Apply an intersectionality lens in your approach to culture and diversity and recognise the complexities of diversity and culture in relations to service provision across international service organisations |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
1, 3, 4 |
| 7 | Recognise the power and authority that impacts international social service organisations and impacts service provision and service users |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
3, 4, 5, 6 |
| 8 | Ability to work effectively with others in a group environment and engage professionally with peers |
Knowledgeable Creative and critical thinker Empowered |
7
|
| CODE | COMPETENCY |
| Australian Association of Social Workers | |
| 1 | Practice Standard 1: AASW Code of Ethics |
| 3 | Practice Standard 3: Human rights and social justice |
| 4 | Practice Standard 4: Culture, identity and intersectionality |
| 5 | Practice Standard 5: Critical thinking in practice |
| 6 | Practice Standard 6: Exercising professional judgement |
| 7 | Practice Standard 7: Professional identity |
| 9 | Practice Standard 9: Professional growth |
Refer to the UniSC Glossary of terms for definitions of “pre-requisites, co-requisites and anti-requisites”.
Enrolled in any PGRD Program
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Standard Grading (GRD)
| High Distinction (HD), Distinction (DN), Credit (CR), Pass (PS), Fail (FL). |
Tutorial activities, discussions and Assessment Task 1 will be used to provide early feedback on the understanding of course content.
| Delivery mode | Task No. | Assessment Product | Individual or Group | Weighting % | What is the duration / length? | When should I submit? | Where should I submit it? |
| All | 1 | Oral and Written Piece | Individual | 30% | 1500 words |
Week 5 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 2 | Artefact - Creative, and Oral | Group | 30% | A 15-minute in-class group presentation followed by Q&A for a maximum of 5 minutes, a 300-word group process statement, and a 300-word peer-review. |
Week 8 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check and in class |
| All | 3 | Written Piece | Individual | 30% | A 2000-word written piece excluding reference list. |
Week 11 | Online Assignment Submission with plagiarism check |
| All | 4 | Activity Participation | Individual | 10% | 10 Tutorials |
Throughout teaching period (refer to Format) | In Class |
| All - Assessment Task 1:Newspaper Article Review | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This task aims to engage students to demonstrate their developing understanding of international social work concepts. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Oral and Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | In this assessment, students will undertake a critical review of a media article to demonstrate their beginning understanding of course concepts. Choose an article from a globally acclaimed newspaper (e.g. The Guardian, The New York Times, The Hindu, The Independent) where the author provides their perspective on a global social development situation concerning human rights. Review their perspective with a comprehensive critical analysis (1500 words). Your review should include critical analyses of the author’s standpoint, how the article focus aligns with international social work concepts, the impact of the situation on local-global populations, and social work positionality on the situation from the Australian context. Students will then submit a 4–5-minute video-recorded oral reflection on the process of their review-related learning. Your reflection should include what you learnt from the review process, connecting your learning with social work values and ethical principles, and how you’d sustain the learning with examples. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 2:Group Presentation and Peer-review | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This task aims to engage students in a critical exploration of international issues in a chosen region/country through group presentation, write a group process statement, and undertake a review of peer-presentation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Artefact - Creative, and Oral | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | This is a group presentation task, involving writing a group process statement, and a peer-review of another group presentation. Drawing from course materials, academic literature, and other authentic sources, students will choose and research an international socio-political issue from a specific region/country and relate to that issue from an Australian context. Note that the topic students choose for this task will also be the topic they use for Task 3 individual social work response. Students will develop and deliver a comprehensive 15-minute (maximum) group/team-presentation in class. In an interactive style using the whiteboard, they will pose stimulus questions to the audience to gather spontaneous responses (5 minutes). They will submit a 300-word statement on group processes including shared responsibilities and contributions. They will also review another group’s in-class presentation and submit a 300-word written peer-review on Canvas. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 3:Individual Response with Intervention Plan | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goal: | This task aims to engage students to develop a case study, addressing the international issue in a particular region/country and offer social work intervention/s plan. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Product: | Written Piece | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Format: | In their Task 2 group presentation, students researched an international socio-political issue and offered critical analyses aligned with international social work. Using the same topic as was used for Task 2, students in this individual critical response paper will develop a case study pertaining to that issue/s. In their response, students will offer appropriate social work intervention/s plan with relevance to global and local social work contexts with considerations of professional values, ethical principles, cultural safety and cultural responsiveness. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Problem solving, Organisation, Information literacy |
||||||||||||||||||
| All - Assessment Task 4:Tutorial Attendance and Active Participation | |||||||||||||
| Goal: | AASW external accreditation requires mandatory attendance for skills-based tutorials. Students must attend weekly tutorials and actively participate in all tutorial activities. |
||||||||||||
| Product: | Activity Participation | ||||||||||||
| Authorship Statement: | |||||||||||||
| Format: | Tutorial attendance will be recorded to meet external AASW accreditation requirements. Student participation and engagement in tutorial activities are assessed based upon weekly attendance and active participation across all tutorials. Students are expected to engage and collaborate with peers and teacher/s showing professionalism for effectively and positively contributing to class interactions and discussions. They will respectfully interact, generate and facilitate class activities. |
||||||||||||
| Criteria: |
|
||||||||||||
| Generic Skills: | Communication, Collaboration, Problem solving, Organisation, Applying technologies, Information literacy |
||||||||||||
| Programme Delivery Mode | Assessment Type | Title | Competency | Teaching Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) | ||||
| All delivery modes | Activity Participation | Tutorial Attendance and Active Participation | 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed |
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Artefact - Creative, and Oral | Group Presentation and Peer-review | 3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Oral and Written Piece | Newspaper Article Review | 3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| Written Piece | Individual Response with Intervention Plan | 3 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |
| 4 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 5 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 6 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
| 9 | Taught, Practiced, Assessed | |||
A 12-unit course will have total of 150 learning hours which will include directed study hours (including online if required), self-directed learning and completion of assessable tasks. Student workload is calculated at 12.5 learning hours per one unit.
Please note: Course information, including specific information of recommended readings, learning activities, resources, weekly readings, etc. are available on the course Canvas site– Please log in as soon as possible.
You need regular access to the resource(s) below. Many texts are available as ebooks through the Library at no additional cost.
| Required? | Author | Year | Title | Edition | Publisher |
| Required | David Cox,Manohar Pawar | 2012 | International Social Work | 2nd ed. | SAGE |
| Recommended | Lynne M. Healy,Rosemary J. Link | 2012 | Handbook of International Social Work | n/a | Oxford University Press, USA |
Not applicable
Academic integrity is the ethical standard of university participation. It ensures that students graduate as a result of proving they are competent in their discipline. This is integral in maintaining the value of academic qualifications. Each industry has expectations and standards of the skills and knowledge within that discipline and these are reflected in assessment.
Academic integrity means that you do not engage in any activity that is considered to be academic fraud; including plagiarism, collusion or outsourcing any part of any assessment item to any other person. You are expected to be honest and ethical by completing all work yourself and indicating in your work which ideas and information were developed by you and which were taken from others. You cannot provide your assessment work to others. You are also expected to provide evidence of wide and critical reading, usually by using appropriate academic references.
In order to minimise incidents of academic fraud, this course may require that some of its assessment tasks, when submitted to Canvas, are electronically checked through Turnitin. This software allows for text comparisons to be made between your submitted assessment item and all other work to which Turnitin has access.
Eligibility for Supplementary Assessment
Your eligibility for supplementary assessment in a course is dependent of the following conditions applying:
(a) The final mark is in the percentage range 47% to 49.4%; and
(b) The course is graded using the Standard Grading scale
Late submissions may be penalised up to and including the following maximum percentage of the assessment task’s identified value, with weekdays and weekends included in the calculation of days late:
(a) One day: deduct 5%;
(b) Two days: deduct 10%;
(c) Three days: deduct 20%;
(d) Four days: deduct 40%;
(e) Five days: deduct 60%;
(f) Six days: deduct 80%;
(g) Seven days: A result of zero is awarded for the assessment task.
The following penalties will apply for a late submission for an online examination:
Less than 15 minutes: No penalty
From 15 minutes to 30 minutes: 20% penalty
More than 30 minutes: 100% penalty
For more information on Academic Learning & Teaching categories including:
For more information, visit https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-and-procedures#academic-learning-and-teaching
UniSC is committed to excellence in teaching, research and engagement in an environment that is inclusive, inspiring, safe and respectful. The Student Charter sets out what students can expect from the University, and what in turn is expected of students, to achieve these outcomes.
For course-specific questions, contact your teaching staff or Course Coordinator.
For other enquiries or to access support, please contact Student Central: